Re: [yocto] [docs] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] scripts/run-docs-build: remove gatesgarth

[Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>]

Hi Richard,

Thanks for the review!

On 11/24/21 7:10 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 18:16 +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>> Together with the corresponding Bitbake version, which are no
>> longer supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
>> ---
>>  scripts/run-docs-build | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/run-docs-build b/scripts/run-docs-build
>> index 3db4a97..5e1d649 100755
>> --- a/scripts/run-docs-build
>> +++ b/scripts/run-docs-build
>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ mkdir $outputdir/bitbake/next
>>  cp -r ./_build/final/* $outputdir/bitbake/next
>>  
>>  # stable branches
>> -for branch in 1.46 1.48 1.50 1.52; do
>> +for branch in 1.46 1.50 1.52; do
>>      git checkout $branch
>>      make clean
>>      make publish
>> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ mkdir $outputdir/next
>>  cp -r ./_build/final/* $outputdir/next
>>  
>>  # stable branches
>> -for branch in dunfell gatesgarth hardknott honister; do
>> +for branch in dunfell hardknott honister; do
>>      cd $ypdocs
>>      git checkout $branch
>>      make clean
> I'm a bit torn on this. They are no longer officially supported releases now but
> it may make sense to rebuild all the sphinx docs in this script rather than some
> subset?


I understand. Your decision to make.
I just proposed this change for consistency with the current implementation.

Any other opinions?

Cheers
Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com