From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:06:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1915354.hxpEe7tUeI@xps13> References: <1478504326-68105-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <83319780-26e9-afb6-74cd-20c07dad04a7@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Xen-devel To: "Tan, Jianfeng" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101FE6CB5 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:06:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id r141so12275654wmg.1 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:06:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83319780-26e9-afb6-74cd-20c07dad04a7@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng: > Hi Thomas and Konrad, > > On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: > >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to > >>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the > >>> maintainer of all xen-related files. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan > >> Applied > >> > >> Please Jianfeng, could you start your new role by sending a status > >> of Xen dom0 support in DPDK? I think there are some issues in latest releases. > > Yes, I'm on this. And hope to send out update in the next week. > > > Pls also CC me and xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org if possible. > > Glad to do that. > > Thanks, > Jianfeng Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK? I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community. Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not fixed yet: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?