From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] PM / Domains: Add generic OF-based PM domain look-up Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:45:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1916405.TGJZ1EAH2O@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1409838756-31963-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <8273189.CFBBe805uk@vostro.rjw.lan> <20140909114051.GT2601@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:60498 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756556AbaIINZz (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 09:25:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140909114051.GT2601@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Ulf Hansson , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Geert Uytterhoeven , Kevin Hilman , Alan Stern , Daniel Lezcano , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Walleij , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Stephen Boyd On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:40:51 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > --FJ0JV+AOCbvjFtNn > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:26:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The s-o-b is more of a gray area, but again it is supposed to be possible > > to verify which it won't be if it bounces. > > That's always going to be an issue with signoffs - people's addresses > can and do go bad at any point. I know and that's a gray area as I said. Whether or not it is appropriate to submit a patch with an s-o-b that is known to bounce is a good question to me. It is true, though, that this particular patch was originally submitted when the s-o-b address didn't bounce, so I may restore the tag when applying the patch. Need to think about that. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki) Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:45:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] PM / Domains: Add generic OF-based PM domain look-up In-Reply-To: <20140909114051.GT2601@sirena.org.uk> References: <1409838756-31963-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <8273189.CFBBe805uk@vostro.rjw.lan> <20140909114051.GT2601@sirena.org.uk> Message-ID: <1916405.TGJZ1EAH2O@vostro.rjw.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:40:51 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > --FJ0JV+AOCbvjFtNn > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:26:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The s-o-b is more of a gray area, but again it is supposed to be possible > > to verify which it won't be if it bounces. > > That's always going to be an issue with signoffs - people's addresses > can and do go bad at any point. I know and that's a gray area as I said. Whether or not it is appropriate to submit a patch with an s-o-b that is known to bounce is a good question to me. It is true, though, that this particular patch was originally submitted when the s-o-b address didn't bounce, so I may restore the tag when applying the patch. Need to think about that. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.