All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>,
	Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] remoteproc: Introduce deny_sysfs_ops flag
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 11:48:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1930fba4-70bd-f602-6dbd-f1cc8071da10@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201122053317.GJ807@yoga>

On 11/21/20 11:33 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 20 Nov 21:44 CST 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> 
>> On 11/20/20 9:38 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Fri 20 Nov 21:01 CST 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
>>>
>>>> The remoteproc framework provides sysfs interfaces for changing
>>>> the firmware name and for starting/stopping a remote processor
>>>> through the sysfs files 'state' and 'firmware'. The 'recovery'
>>>> sysfs file can also be used similarly to control the error recovery
>>>> state machine of a remoteproc. These interfaces are currently
>>>> allowed irrespective of how the remoteprocs were booted (like
>>>> remoteproc self auto-boot, remoteproc client-driven boot etc).
>>>> These interfaces can adversely affect a remoteproc and its clients
>>>> especially when a remoteproc is being controlled by a remoteproc
>>>> client driver(s). Also, not all remoteproc drivers may want to
>>>> support the sysfs interfaces by default.
>>>>
>>>> Add support to deny the sysfs state/firmware/recovery change by
>>>> introducing a state flag 'deny_sysfs_ops' that the individual
>>>> remoteproc drivers can set based on their usage needs. The default
>>>> behavior is to allow the sysfs operations as before.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This makes sense, but can't we implement attribute_group->is_visible to
>>> simply hide these entries from userspace instead of leaving them
>>> "broken"?
>>
>> I would have to look into that, but can that be changed dynamically?
>> Also, note that the enforcement is only on the writes/stores which impact
>> the state-machine, but not the reads/shows.
>>
>> For PRU usecases, we will be setting this dynamically.
>>
> 
> It looks to be dynamic, but I don't know if there's any "caching"
> involved. Please have a look and let me know.

OK, will do. I can only check the week after though.

regards
Suman

> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
>> regards
>> Suman
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bjorn
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: revised to account for the 'recovery' sysfs file as well, patch
>>>>     description updated accordingly
>>>> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20180915003725.17549-5-s-anna@ti.com/
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>  include/linux/remoteproc.h            |  2 ++
>>>>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
>>>> index bd2950a246c9..3fd18a71c188 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c
>>>> @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ static ssize_t recovery_store(struct device *dev,
>>>>  {
>>>>  	struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
>>>>  
>>>> +	/* restrict sysfs operations if not allowed by remoteproc drivers */
>>>> +	if (rproc->deny_sysfs_ops)
>>>> +		return -EPERM;
>>>> +
>>>>  	if (sysfs_streq(buf, "enabled")) {
>>>>  		/* change the flag and begin the recovery process if needed */
>>>>  		rproc->recovery_disabled = false;
>>>> @@ -158,6 +162,10 @@ static ssize_t firmware_store(struct device *dev,
>>>>  	char *p;
>>>>  	int err, len = count;
>>>>  
>>>> +	/* restrict sysfs operations if not allowed by remoteproc drivers */
>>>> +	if (rproc->deny_sysfs_ops)
>>>> +		return -EPERM;
>>>> +
>>>>  	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
>>>>  	if (err) {
>>>>  		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, err);
>>>> @@ -225,6 +233,10 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
>>>>  	struct rproc *rproc = to_rproc(dev);
>>>>  	int ret = 0;
>>>>  
>>>> +	/* restrict sysfs operations if not allowed by remoteproc drivers */
>>>> +	if (rproc->deny_sysfs_ops)
>>>> +		return -EPERM;
>>>> +
>>>>  	if (sysfs_streq(buf, "start")) {
>>>>  		if (rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
>>>>  			return -EBUSY;
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>> index 3fa3ba6498e8..dbc3767f7d0e 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>>>> @@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
>>>>   * @has_iommu: flag to indicate if remote processor is behind an MMU
>>>>   * @auto_boot: flag to indicate if remote processor should be auto-started
>>>>   * @autonomous: true if an external entity has booted the remote processor
>>>> + * @deny_sysfs_ops: flag to not permit sysfs operations on state, firmware and recovery
>>>>   * @dump_segments: list of segments in the firmware
>>>>   * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
>>>>   * @char_dev: character device of the rproc
>>>> @@ -545,6 +546,7 @@ struct rproc {
>>>>  	bool has_iommu;
>>>>  	bool auto_boot;
>>>>  	bool autonomous;
>>>> +	bool deny_sysfs_ops;
>>>>  	struct list_head dump_segments;
>>>>  	int nb_vdev;
>>>>  	u8 elf_class;
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.28.0
>>>>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-22 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-21  3:01 [PATCH v2 0/3] remoteproc sysfs fixes/improvements Suman Anna
2020-11-21  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] remoteproc: Fix unbalanced boot with sysfs for no auto-boot rprocs Suman Anna
2020-11-26 22:31   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-11-21  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] remoteproc: Introduce deny_sysfs_ops flag Suman Anna
2020-11-21  3:38   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-11-21  3:44     ` Suman Anna
2020-11-22  5:33       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-11-22 17:48         ` Suman Anna [this message]
2020-11-21  3:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] remoteproc: wkup_m3: Set " Suman Anna
2020-11-21  3:39   ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-12-26 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] remoteproc sysfs fixes/improvements Christian Gmeiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1930fba4-70bd-f602-6dbd-f1cc8071da10@ti.com \
    --to=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.