From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ajay Bhargav <ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:45:38 +0530 (IST)
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: Add GPIO driver for Marvell SoC
 Armada100
In-Reply-To: <F766E4F80769BD478052FB6533FA745D19FB089D26@SC-VEXCH4.marvell.com>
Message-ID: <1939544051.460.1311570938194.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de


----- "Prafulla Wadaskar" <prafulla@marvell.com> wrote:

> The main objective of having mvgpio.c is to share/reuse a driver code
> across several SoCs.
> 
> If most of the SoCs (what we know) have similar register definition,
> it makes sense to keep them in mvgpio.c
> 
> What may differ for each SOC is that- base addresses, number of GPIOs,
> number of GPIO Banks, that should go in asm/arch/gpio.h
> 
> If any future SoC follows totally different GPIO architecture, we can
> always have _gpio.c.
> 
> Regards..
> Prafulla . .
> 

So what about v2 patches i sent? I did things accordingly you said.
can you please review them and let me know if any changes are required.

Regards,
Ajay Bhargav