From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4368EC433F5 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EB8610E5 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230417AbhKANfJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:35:09 -0400 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.132]:57143 "EHLO out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231741AbhKANfJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:35:09 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R101e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01424;MF=xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=14;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UucB9j2_1635773551; Received: from 30.225.212.104(mailfrom:xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UucB9j2_1635773551) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 21:32:32 +0800 Message-ID: <19fde29a-5a63-3fe7-2e83-307a974c80ad@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 21:32:31 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Will Deacon , helgaas@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211027081035.53370-1-xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com> <20211101093618.GA27400@willie-the-truck> <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com> From: Xuesong Chen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 01/11/2021 20:22, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:12:15PM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote: >> I'm very sorry about the non-constructived response, and I'd like to >> take this chance to withdraw them entirely... personally this is not a >> good example in terms of the mood or the way of expression. > > Good idea. There are other maintainers who would ignore you indefinitely > for uncalled for explosions like that. And then you would have achieved > the opposite of what you were aiming for, with that rant. Actually that's my original intention, especially when you take lots of serious effors to rework it round by round, but no one say YES or NO, which is really frustrating. Hopefully the newbies can also be treated fairly in the community. During my working experience in the community before, lot's of nice maintainers give me very deep impression. What a splendid memory! > > To Will's point, you can always read Documentation/process/ while > waiting for your patches to get reviewed - there the whole process is > explained and what the best ways and times are to send a patchset. Good suggestion, learnt and thanks! Thanks, Xuesong > > HTH. > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41A3C433EF for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7218661051 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:38:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 7218661051 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=tHKgTOLhUFNXrJ7d7Bhx4nJxZ2i1Wox2VsehXue2L9w=; b=w/E5D13sxnmj+H XakcmtZ2RqRUe8AQqgzPExmjSNKMCWIDLHCZQoRBlq+YOUEJYXbPYoABu1JEXHdEKF/CJvGfCyxs4 hoAG/Q4+3yXz0jT+hU8cHQtdDu8H3+PEFotm1tiBcDwxd9riHasCWHECGGKysKNVqRyuPmjOWJjHF etKH1FxsWu1azJqC07O/bTMYBUoSTp91XE/gGqAx0WlIHXMAyYm5q1GfS9DCoFoQ0OxFG6SAQZLpl 7LgYXQGUOWOxbhPpWY1gg253BUa0qkiJQXhAPdBPvbveclvyYH23sLAulDObPNm2vz7GHjbzb6CQD thicXpkH2BI91aOs5Ztw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhXQi-00GTm3-5k; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:32:52 +0000 Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com ([47.88.44.36]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhXQd-00GTlQ-K6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:32:49 +0000 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R101e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e01424; MF=xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=14; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UucB9j2_1635773551; Received: from 30.225.212.104(mailfrom:xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UucB9j2_1635773551) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 21:32:32 +0800 Message-ID: <19fde29a-5a63-3fe7-2e83-307a974c80ad@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 21:32:31 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Will Deacon , helgaas@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20211027081035.53370-1-xuesong.chen@linux.alibaba.com> <20211101093618.GA27400@willie-the-truck> <286ac625-e712-d7e9-2f5d-923f1572b5d1@linux.alibaba.com> From: Xuesong Chen In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211101_063247_838886_F2FF0369 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 01/11/2021 20:22, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:12:15PM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote: >> I'm very sorry about the non-constructived response, and I'd like to >> take this chance to withdraw them entirely... personally this is not a >> good example in terms of the mood or the way of expression. > > Good idea. There are other maintainers who would ignore you indefinitely > for uncalled for explosions like that. And then you would have achieved > the opposite of what you were aiming for, with that rant. Actually that's my original intention, especially when you take lots of serious effors to rework it round by round, but no one say YES or NO, which is really frustrating. Hopefully the newbies can also be treated fairly in the community. During my working experience in the community before, lot's of nice maintainers give me very deep impression. What a splendid memory! > > To Will's point, you can always read Documentation/process/ while > waiting for your patches to get reviewed - there the whole process is > explained and what the best ways and times are to send a patchset. Good suggestion, learnt and thanks! Thanks, Xuesong > > HTH. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel