It looks patch 08 is not listed on the https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/list/.
I just re-sent it, hope it could reach the mailing list this time.
I'll also send it in attachment style via private route to you.

Thanks and best regards
-Lv

> From: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Zheng, Lv
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:04 AM
> 
> I was using linux-pm.git/linux-next base which I downloaded a week ago.
> Maybe the conflict was caused by the fast-path ACPICA table fix merged after my downloading.
> Let me check again.
> 
> Thanks and best regards
> -Lv
> 
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@rjwysocki.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 5:04 AM
> >
> > On Monday, October 19, 2015 10:25:32 AM Lv Zheng wrote:
> > > ACPICA commit 0dd68e16274cd38224aa4781eddc57dc2cbaa108
> > >
> > > The quit/exit commands shouldn't invoke acpi_terminate_debugger() and
> > > acpi_terminate() right in the user command loop, because when the debugger
> > > exits, the kernel ACPI subsystem shouldn't be terminated (acpi_terminate())
> > > and the debugger should only be terminated by its users
> > > (acpi_terminate_debugger()) rather than being terminated itself. Leaving such
> > > invocations causes kernel panic when the debugger is shipped in the Linux
> > > kernel.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes this issue. Lv Zheng.
> > >
> > > Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/0dd68e16
> > > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> >
> > This patch does not apply for me on top of the current mainline.
> >
> > What tree is it applicable to?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> 
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{�i�b�{ay�ʇڙ�,j
��f���h���z��w���
> 
> ���j:+v���w�j�m����
����zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i