From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QS4H7-0008Eh-2k for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:33:09 +0200 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so565417wwb.24 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 02:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.58.65 with SMTP id f1mr542094wbh.3.1307006994262; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 02:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.96] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c17sm263066wbh.12.2011.06.02.02.29.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 02:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <20110602063130.GG3281@jama.jama.net> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:29:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1B4F7800-9032-4A5F-9AA7-4266DD38CBD6@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1306960406.3119.6.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <1306961600.3119.15.camel@lenovo.internal.reciva.com> <4DE6B299.2060507@linux.intel.com> <20110601215232.GE3281@jama.jama.net> <4DE6BAE6.3040406@linux.intel.com> <20110602063130.GG3281@jama.jama.net> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gnutls: link against 'dl' library X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:33:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Op 2 jun 2011, om 08:31 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 03:19:18PM -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >> On 06/01/2011 02:52 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:43:53PM -0700, Saul Wold wrote: >>>> On 06/01/2011 02:00 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 20:53, Phil Blundell wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:39 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>>>> Are you able to reproduce it? >>>>>> >>>>>> No, it works fine for me. I get: >>>>>> >>>>>> checking how to link with libpthread... -lpthread >>>>>> checking for libdl... yes >>>>>> checking how to link with libdl... -ldl >>>>>> checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes >>>>>> >>>>>> This is with the current head of oe-core on qemuarm. >>>>> >>>>> I am building for i586 but I doubt it is related. >>>>> >>>>> I get: >>>>> >>>>> checking for libpthread... yes >>>>> checking how to link with libpthread... /usr/lib/libpthread.so >>>>> checking for libdl... no >>>>> checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes >>>>> >>>> I also built for x86 and beagle, both have libdl, can you check that you >>>> do not have some kind of site configuration that is overriding, also >>>> maybe post your log from .../gnutls-2.12.5/lib/config.log >>> >>> here it tries to link against host libdl >>> >>> configure:26050: checking for libdl >>> configure:26069: arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv4t -mtune=arm920t >>> --sysroot=/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/om-gta02 -o conftest -O2 -pipe -g >>> -feliminate-unused-debug-types >>> -I/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/om-gta02/usr/include -Wl,-O1 >>> -Wl,--as-needed conftest.c /usr/lib/libdl.so>&5 >>> /usr/lib/libdl.so: file not recognized: File format not recognized >>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >>> >> Well that's interesting, since I see it linking using -ldl, there must >> be some other setting that's affecting this, I have been looking in >> gnutls to see if I can find something else that sets libdl.so vs -ldl, >> I have not found it. >> >> configure:26075: i586-poky-linux-gcc -march=i586 >> --sysroot=/builds/world/tmp/sysroots/qemux86 -o conftest -O2 -pipe -g >> -feliminate-unused-debug-types >> -I/builds/world/tmp/sysroots/qemux86/usr/include -Wl,-O1 >> -Wl,--as-needed conftest.c -ldl >&5 >> configure:26075: $? = 0 >> configure:26085: result: yes >> configure:26092: checking how to link with libdl >> configure:26094: result: -ldl > > what do you have in configlog for LIBDL? > > here it's all empty > LIBDL='' > LIBDL_PREFIX='' > LTLIBDL='' I get for cross gnutls in lib/config.log: grep LIBDL lib/config.log HAVE_LIBDL='no' LIBDL='' LIBDL_PREFIX='' LTLIBDL='' regards, Koen