All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seth Goldberg <seth.goldberg@oracle.com>
To: The development of GNU GRUB <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Cc: "Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>,
	edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>,
	"arvidjaar@gmail.com" <arvidjaar@gmail.com>,
	"glin@suse.com" <glin@suse.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [grub PATCH] efinet: disable MNP background polling
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:39:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1BAD7DA9-D60E-4743-9143-3327989DF6B6@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151014110847.GQ6226@olila.local.net-space.pl>



> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:08 AM, Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 05:19:32AM +0000, Ye, Ting wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> If I understand the issue correctly, I don't quite agree that UEFI
>> spec is imprecise about SNP constraints described as following.
>> The "constraint" described here is that the grub should use attribute
>> "EXCLUSIVE" to open SNP protocol to gain exclusive access. This usage
>> is clearly described in page 184, chapter 6.3 EFI_BOOT_SERVICES.OpenProtocol().
>> 
>> EXCLUSIVE        Used by applications to gain exclusive access to a protocol interface.
>>            If any drivers have the protocol interface opened with an attribute of BY_DRIVER,
>>            then an attempt will be made to remove them by calling the driver's Stop() function.
>> 
>> The grub code should not assume that the SNP is not occupied by other
>> drivers, instead, it should use EXCLUSIVE to open SNP protocol, or to
>> be more precise, use OpenProtocolInformation() to check whether SNP is
>> already opened by other driver, then decide whether need to use EXCLUSIVE
>> to disconnect the other drivers. This is the typical usage for all UEFI
>> protocol, not particular constraints to SNP protocol.
> 
> Looks good! Great! However, it looks that we still have a problem if somebody
> opens SNP in EXCLUSIVE mode. Then GRUB2 SNP open will fail according to UEFI spec.
> Sadly we do not have a control on other stuff and one day our approach may fail
> because somebody decided to open SNP in EXCLUSIVE mode in e.g. a driver. Does
> it mean that migration to MNP is one sensible solution for our problems? As I know
> this is huge overhaul, so, we should think twice before choosing that way.


   Then it is fortunate that when I wrote the MNP implementation that we ship with Oracle Solaris 11.2, that I tested it on many thousands of systems as well as on new UEFI implementations at the UEFI Plugfest ;).

  --S



> 
> Daniel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-14 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-01  9:26 [PATCH] efinet: disable MNP background polling HATAYAMA Daisuke
2015-10-01 11:50 ` [grub PATCH] " Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-01 17:53   ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-10-01 22:04     ` Yinghai Lu
2015-10-02  3:48       ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-10-09 10:15     ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2015-10-13 22:11     ` Daniel Kiper
2015-10-13 22:23       ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-14  1:01       ` Yinghai Lu
2015-10-14  7:00         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-10-09 10:10   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2015-10-09 11:19     ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-13 21:49   ` Daniel Kiper
2015-10-13 22:21     ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-13 22:56       ` Daniel Kiper
2015-10-14  0:43       ` Seth Goldberg
2015-10-14  5:19       ` [edk2] " Ye, Ting
2015-10-14  5:57         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-10-14  6:15           ` Ye, Ting
2015-10-14  6:58             ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-10-14  8:00               ` Ye, Ting
2015-10-14 17:52                 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2015-10-14 11:08         ` Daniel Kiper
2015-10-14 15:39           ` Seth Goldberg [this message]
2015-10-15  2:11             ` Ye, Ting
2015-10-15 18:14               ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15 22:33                 ` Andrew Fish
2015-10-15 22:57                   ` Michael Brown
2015-10-15 23:38                   ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-29 14:47             ` Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
2015-10-01 17:40 ` [PATCH] " Andrei Borzenkov
2015-10-09 10:30   ` HATAYAMA Daisuke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1BAD7DA9-D60E-4743-9143-3327989DF6B6@oracle.com \
    --to=seth.goldberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
    --cc=edk2-devel@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=glin@suse.com \
    --cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=ting.ye@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.