From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEEAC433ED for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36FD1610A5 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:49:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 36FD1610A5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FRcd64WmZz2yxk for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 00:49:30 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=TDoecZkx; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a; helo=mail-oi1-x22a.google.com; envelope-from=proclivis@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=TDoecZkx; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FRccj1dbqz2xfh for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 00:49:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id k18so44471258oik.1 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=oG5pR/5+vSi4D6XBo8tXTmz5DrG6+I+plbUEVaEFDk4=; b=TDoecZkxeNJ2sxkyj6UjDA8vfpRazzDfSO9vsihyHu60fH3j4SzATwigzg7S6QyC0Y jn7RVC9hD6K0iY1TT1txvRIK4u+WZO4ib8ISVex3O+belD1cgaWi8RYR6Hv2g8RXQ367 TzQbpFdeSPTd+5676ayeJB/7R7lePtexEMluMXMad2vZPrQF9GYTziP9zPtr7J9WrCTe NJqess3nXvhB7ZRHAC/dN0BRMLOWyg5I65G1ZQXTj1zYOjBzFPRljA34zpel/8ScFaaO y+09z6dChx68QIU2vJx7gma3CMg40jP1UUpbjQP7k6dPODGi38Pqw7jWTcpBsEOQtPxc Z23Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=oG5pR/5+vSi4D6XBo8tXTmz5DrG6+I+plbUEVaEFDk4=; b=djlWR43/1mZjcaZo4xa83IUglJzZaazsGTp9D3MRXkixQJ+1BuepX33IBZbRy248LT zVCNo2xtSkjhZQkzcgQLleZwbX7Z2/Ir+51ZYMyjCi5Pyap1Po+ki4v1m6X4yuRczlGz TN+aZiSlIsxUKZbV1Sv9kfyIDWYfyotZt0FkbO3oPUWWoopbPB2mdrQI5KkPs2Q4I51r nn7aRCDWwr9rryTGu5g/UuLox2Op0Q5s0SGiaFw6TcVVAHKmSiTAS+ndL4rZKZ/SZSbK 6P7fmVIOnDkiCGuEf6PeCKg7yISAp52XarUF87AG92/QnnbMf8TYfS2ugBWCEeBJE3cy /ivw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eVFieSnrPtjYqytZscd1K47bu/cJqsFNIa5TJH/U9OzkiuC6v Z5nCMfgBDAK13RteLxMYv8Eld1W17Tg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCY7JzCJClMiY/Wj8PgYKBXcB9fKeG9LlHPH+oDbQFdGHRc6O2R8QztGXKYntmS12eDFOmzA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:1c03:: with SMTP id c3mr3108290oic.47.1619189347120; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:281:c001:2359:7982:337a:e73e:2882? ([2601:281:c001:2359:7982:337a:e73e:2882]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u139sm1280592oia.52.2021.04.23.07.49.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 07:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) Subject: Re: PMC From: Mike Jones In-Reply-To: <31F00F60-DF2D-40FB-A9BC-85538975398D@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:49:05 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1F0D01CD-2A39-49B3-9E63-DDFCA3371672@gmail.com> References: <31F00F60-DF2D-40FB-A9BC-85538975398D@gmail.com> To: Patrick Williams X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" Patrick, We are using spec: Open Rack V3 48V BBU. In the case of a PMC, since I don=E2=80=99t know the OCP architecture = well, is there a PMC device in the rack that would manage a BBU, or do = devices that plug into their rack each have a PMC? Looking at the above spec, the functions of the MCU are quite limited, = so I assume there is a PMC device that is managing these other elements = like a BBU.=20 Perhaps there is a spec for that I can look at? Mike > On Apr 23, 2021, at 7:39 AM, Mike wrote: >=20 > ADI is working on a reference design using an Open Compute PMC spec. I = will find the spec and get back. >=20 > Sent from my iPhone >=20 >> On Apr 23, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Patrick Williams = wrote: >>=20 >> =EF=BB=BFOn Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:40:40PM -0600, Mike wrote: >>> Is OBMC ever used as firmware for a PMC (Power Management = Controller)? >>=20 >> Hi Mike, >>=20 >> We were working on a power management controller as a potential = design >> option for OCP Rack v3 and we presented an early look of that work at >> the 2020 OCP Tech Week. We haven't made much progress on = implementation >> at this point though as we've been focused on other aspects of the = ORv3 >> design. As code is available we plan to deliver it on Gerrit. >>=20 >> Is there anything there you'd like to collaborate with from a design = / >> requirements perspective? >>=20 >> --=20 >> Patrick Williams