From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932904AbXBKW5a (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:57:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932906AbXBKW5a (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:57:30 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]:45086 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932904AbXBKW52 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 17:57:28 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BchkENQGz6qwzkhKb0dd5/DrRtrGbdJEkFMp8WP1zg5UMZLY8v5QSyTxLhTLwD/oHWY7p4T98aHLKKV/cehEEdbNYblYnpiLkh5KuqgGX/u99n/M2Qbc3vNPTb1Sow6FgjOMAVT7O+SLGBDhkm5NqfJWTzBmNLH/VAhRXQddmdA= Message-ID: <1a297b360702111457k3a38eefei485f814f980e58c6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 02:57:26 +0400 From: "Manu Abraham" To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net Subject: Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? Cc: "Willy Tarreau" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Pavel Machek" , "Arjan van de Ven" , LKML , tilman@imap.cc In-Reply-To: <1171234027.4493.88.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1171058269.1484.64.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <1171059433.8675.195.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20070210193851.GA3956@ucw.cz> <200702102320.39531.rjw@sisk.pl> <1171147026.19894.16.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <20070211064636.GA12171@1wt.eu> <1171234027.4493.88.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/12/07, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Neither am I. I'm just asking that new drivers have power management as > standard. What if the hardware doesn't support power management ? regards, manu