All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/26] bisect.c: libify `check_merge_bases` and its dependents.
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 02:11:20 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a955345100ed3e953bc7b9f0c6ce66f6b2b4e2a.1551003074.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.117.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

From: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>

Since we want to get rid of git-bisect.sh it would be necessary to
convert those exit() calls to return statements so that errors can be
reported.

Emulate try catch in C by converting `exit(<positive-value>)` to
`return <negetive-value>`. Follow POSIX conventions to return
<negative-value> to indicate error.

Turn `exit()` to `return` calls in `check_merge_bases()`.

In `check_merge_bases()` there is an early success special case,
so we have introduced special error code `-11` which indicates early
success. This `-11` is converted back to `0` in `check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad()`.

Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Mentored by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tanushree Tumane <tanushreetumane@gmail.com>
---
 bisect.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bisect.c b/bisect.c
index 1f2f3201a3..1134854fe2 100644
--- a/bisect.c
+++ b/bisect.c
@@ -801,13 +801,16 @@ static void handle_skipped_merge_base(const struct object_id *mb)
  * "check_merge_bases" checks that merge bases are not "bad" (or "new").
  *
  * - If one is "bad" (or "new"), it means the user assumed something wrong
- * and we must exit with a non 0 error code.
+ * and we must return error with a non 0 error code.
  * - If one is "good" (or "old"), that's good, we have nothing to do.
  * - If one is "skipped", we can't know but we should warn.
  * - If we don't know, we should check it out and ask the user to test.
+ * - If a merge base must be tested, on success return -11 a special condition
+ * for early success, this will be converted back to 0 in cmd_bisect__helper.
  */
-static void check_merge_bases(int rev_nr, struct commit **rev, int no_checkout)
+static int check_merge_bases(int rev_nr, struct commit **rev, int no_checkout)
 {
+	int res = 0;
 	struct commit_list *result;
 
 	result = get_merge_bases_many(rev[0], rev_nr - 1, rev + 1);
@@ -822,11 +825,16 @@ static void check_merge_bases(int rev_nr, struct commit **rev, int no_checkout)
 			handle_skipped_merge_base(mb);
 		} else {
 			printf(_("Bisecting: a merge base must be tested\n"));
-			exit(-bisect_checkout(mb, no_checkout));
+			res = bisect_checkout(mb, no_checkout);
+			if (!res)
+				/* indicate early success */
+				res = -11;
+			break;
 		}
 	}
 
 	free_commit_list(result);
+	return res;
 }
 
 static int check_ancestors(int rev_nr, struct commit **rev, const char *prefix)
@@ -857,7 +865,7 @@ static void check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad(const char *prefix, int no_checkout)
 {
 	char *filename = git_pathdup("BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK");
 	struct stat st;
-	int fd, rev_nr;
+	int fd, rev_nr, res = 0;
 	struct commit **rev;
 
 	if (!current_bad_oid)
@@ -874,8 +882,10 @@ static void check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad(const char *prefix, int no_checkout)
 	/* Check if all good revs are ancestor of the bad rev. */
 	rev = get_bad_and_good_commits(&rev_nr);
 	if (check_ancestors(rev_nr, rev, prefix))
-		check_merge_bases(rev_nr, rev, no_checkout);
+		res = check_merge_bases(rev_nr, rev, no_checkout);
 	free(rev);
+	if(res)
+		exit(res == -11 ? 0 : -res);
 
 	/* Create file BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK. */
 	fd = open(filename, O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY, 0600);
-- 
gitgitgadget


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-24 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-24 10:11 [PATCH 00/26] Git bisect part3 Tanushree Tumane via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 01/26] bisect--helper: refer branch.buf before strbuf_release(...) Tanushree Tumane via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 02/26] bisect--helper: change `retval` to `res` Tanushree Tumane via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 03/26] bisect--helper: `decide_next()` helper function Tanushree Tumane via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 04/26] bisect.c: libify `exit_if_skipped_commits` to `error_if_skipped...` Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 05/26] bisect.c: libify `bisect_checkout` and its dependants Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 07/26] bisect.c: libify `check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad` and its dependents Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget [this message]
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 08/26] bisect.c: libify `handle_bad_merge_base` and its dependants Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 09/26] bisect.c: libify `bisect_next_all` " Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 10/26] bisect--helper: `bisect_next` and `bisect_auto_next` shell function in C Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 11/26] bisect--helper: Finish `bisect_start()` conversion Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 12/26] bisect--helper: dequote arguments in `bisect-start` Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 13/26] bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-clean-state` subcommand Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 14/26] bisect--helper: retire `--next-all` subcommand Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 15/26] bisect--helper: `bisect_autostart` shell function in C Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 16/26] bisect--helper: `bisect_state` & `bisect_head` " Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 17/26] bisect--helper: retire `--check-expected-revs` subcommand Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 18/26] bisect--helper: retire `--write-terms` subcommand Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 20/26] bisect--helper: `bisect_replay` shell function in C Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 19/26] bisect--helper: `bisect_log` " Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 21/26] bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-write` subcommand Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 22/26] bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-autostart` subcommand Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 23/26] bisect--helper: retire `--bisect-auto-next` subcommand Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 24/26] bisect--helper: remove the dequote in bisect_start() Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 25/26] bisect--helper: `bisect_skip` shell function in C Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget
2019-02-24 10:11 ` [PATCH 26/26] bisect--helper: retire `--check-and-set-terms` subcommand Pranit Bauva via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a955345100ed3e953bc7b9f0c6ce66f6b2b4e2a.1551003074.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=pranit.bauva@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.