From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753286AbeABNbg (ORCPT + 1 other); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 08:31:36 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f172.google.com ([209.85.128.172]:35288 "EHLO mail-wr0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753256AbeABNbe (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jan 2018 08:31:34 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBov3J3SDsMcEi1amItdmTg6NSJL3GY2qYOGiTyytlGaeISHPhq0Ego94Ur6fT7xIkCl9Krlt3Q== Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates From: Claudio Scordino To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Patrick Bellasi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes References: <20171130114723.29210-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20171220153029.dqrtjbyowhqdl56r@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171220155625.lopjlsbvss3qgb4d@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <84cc5951-45c4-3dd6-4f4f-fa5d11e6d1f6@evidence.eu.com> Message-ID: <1afd8769-8f51-184f-221d-4ce68f90371d@evidence.eu.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:31:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <84cc5951-45c4-3dd6-4f4f-fa5d11e6d1f6@evidence.eu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Hi Peter, Il 31/12/2017 10:43, Claudio Scordino ha scritto: > Hi all, > > Il 20/12/2017 16:56, Peter Zijlstra ha scritto: >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:30:29PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> >>> So I ended up with the below (on top of Juri's cpufreq-dl patches). >>> >>> It compiles, but that's about all the testing it had. >> >> Should all be available at: >> >>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/core >> >> compile tested only, I suppose the 0day bot will let me know soon enough >> :-) > > I'm going to do some testing from Tuesday. The rebase looks good to me. Tested on Odroid XU4 (ARM big.LITTLE), no regressions found. Many thanks and best regards, Claudio