From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giulio Benetti Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:11:26 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] ffmpeg: fix static linking build failure when using libavutil In-Reply-To: <20180924130929.4b345624@windsurf> References: <20180911204230.15890-1-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> <20180916222224.519fa1f8@windsurf> <63ee101c-ee45-57cc-4aeb-7f3b49753ccb@micronovasrl.com> <20180924130929.4b345624@windsurf> Message-ID: <1b5dece6-8730-89d4-53dc-44f3492c49d9@micronovasrl.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Il 24/09/2018 13:09, Thomas Petazzoni ha scritto: > Hello, > > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:26:05 +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote: > >>> Indeed, when we're dynamic linking, there is no need to link consumers >>> of libavutil with libdrm. It is only when we're statically linking that >>> it should be done. And that's exactly what Libs vs. Libs.private is for. >> >> You've explained me it very well, but by now FFmpeg upstreamed my patch: >> https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/ffmpeg.git/commit/c50dc77ac708e98d02da7c422a6b9cbf9f565aa5 >> >> So, do I rework and resubmit to them or can I re-create a patch for BR >> with what you've pointed me above? > > Both ? :-) Ok! -- Giulio Benetti CTO MICRONOVA SRL Sede: Via A. Niedda 3 - 35010 Vigonza (PD) Tel. 049/8931563 - Fax 049/8931346 Cod.Fiscale - P.IVA 02663420285 Capitale Sociale ? 26.000 i.v. Iscritta al Reg. Imprese di Padova N. 02663420285 Numero R.E.A. 258642