From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B03C33C9E for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384652082E for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:29:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 384652082E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC73310096CAC; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 20:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; receiver= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B7210096C97 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 20:32:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00B4RF2D019998 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 23:29:10 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xf73j898u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 23:29:10 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:29:09 -0000 Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.194) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:29:06 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 00B4T5kV24969540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:29:05 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A0BA405F; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:29:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA81A4054; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:29:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.85.72.79] (unknown [9.85.72.79]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 04:29:03 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] libnvdimm/namespace: Make namespace size validation arch dependent To: Dan Williams , Jeff Moyer References: <20200108065219.171221-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>

From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:59:01 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20011104-0016-0000-0000-000002DC659B X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20011104-0017-0000-0000-0000333EEABF Message-Id: <1ca0e78d-2c33-30cb-b3b0-f38eea4c7bf8@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-10_04:2020-01-10,2020-01-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001110036 Message-ID-Hash: YSGLF42RJHPNA35LA66TMR3H6VWWSRCG X-Message-ID-Hash: YSGLF42RJHPNA35LA66TMR3H6VWWSRCG X-MailFrom: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: linux-nvdimm X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/11/20 2:33 AM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:39 PM Jeff Moyer wrote: >> >> Hi, Aneesh, >> >> After applying this patch series, several of my namespaces no longer >> enumerate: >> >> Before: >> >> # ndctl list >> [ >> { >> "dev":"namespace0.2", >> "mode":"sector", >> "size":106541672960, >> "uuid":"ea1122b2-c219-424c-b09c-38a6e94a1042", >> "sector_size":512, >> "blockdev":"pmem0.2s" >> }, >> { >> "dev":"namespace0.1", >> "mode":"fsdax", >> "map":"dev", >> "size": >> "uuid":"68b6746f-481a-4ae6-80b5-71d62176606c", >> "sector_size":512, >> "align":4096, >> "blockdev":"pmem0.1" >> }, >> { >> "dev":"namespace0.0", >> "mode":"fsdax", >> "map":"dev", >> "size":52850327552, >> "uuid":"6d3a0199-5d9a-4fed-830d-e25249b70571", >> "sector_size":512, >> "align":2097152, >> "blockdev":"pmem0" >> } >> ] >> >> After: >> >> # ndctl list >> [ >> { >> "dev":"namespace0.0", >> "mode":"fsdax", >> "map":"dev", >> "size":52850327552, >> "uuid":"6d3a0199-5d9a-4fed-830d-e25249b70571", >> "sector_size":512, >> "align":2097152, >> "blockdev":"pmem0" >> } >> ] >> >> I won't have time to dig into it this week, but I wanted to mention it >> before Dan merged these patches. >> >> I'll follow up next week with more information. > > Thanks Jeff, I hadn't had a chance to dig in on these yet. > > Aneesh are you able to run the ndctl unit tests? Even if they don't > run on powerpc you should be able to get them to run on x86 qemu just > to catch the basics. > Thanks for the feedback. I will test the series with qemu. -aneesh _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org