From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sumit Saxena Subject: RE: [PATCH 15/15] megaraid_sas: SPERC boot driver reorder Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:56:37 +0530 Message-ID: <1d2733ee978aebc5d201b4ace1900d89@mail.gmail.com> References: <1450445228-26571-1-git-send-email-Sumit.Saxena@avagotech.com> <1450445228-26571-16-git-send-email-Sumit.Saxena@avagotech.com> <20151218140510.GA6679@infradead.org> 667c88bca37fe6c51b8dc68a7cad498e@mail.gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]:33145 "EHLO mail-lb0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750713AbcALF0j (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:26:39 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x4so9198335lbm.0 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:26:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: 667c88bca37fe6c51b8dc68a7cad498e@mail.gmail.com Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: jbottomley@parallels.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Kashyap Desai , Uday Lingala > -----Original Message----- > From: Sumit Saxena [mailto:sumit.saxena@avagotech.com] > Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 12:37 PM > To: 'Christoph Hellwig' > Cc: 'jbottomley@parallels.com'; 'martin.petersen@oracle.com'; 'linux- > scsi@vger.kernel.org'; Kashyap Desai; Uday Lingala > Subject: RE: [PATCH 15/15] megaraid_sas: SPERC boot driver reorder > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org] > > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 7:35 PM > > To: Sumit Saxena > > Cc: jbottomley@parallels.com; hch@infradead.org; > > martin.petersen@oracle.com; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; > > kashyap.desai@avagotech.com; Uday Lingala > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] megaraid_sas: SPERC boot driver reorder > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 06:57:08PM +0530, Sumit Saxena wrote: > > > This patch will add support for drive ordering for a particular set > > > of device ID > > (0x005D, 0x005F) & subsystem vendor ID(0x1028). > > > > This really has no business in Linux. Everyone should be using uuid > > based disk addressing if they care. Tell Dell they should stop coming > > up with this crap, as they keep leaking this weird ordering things in again and > again. > > This patch can be ignored. We discussed with Dell on this and they are fine to > backout the patch. > Can you provide any feedback on rest of the patches? Gentle reminder.. > > Thanks, > Sumit