From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:39816 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727297AbeJRLrz (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:47:55 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 332014A1D8BA9 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:49:00 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] overlay: add fsck.overlay stress test References: <20181016074559.24728-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com> <20181016074559.24728-4-yi.zhang@huawei.com> From: "zhangyi (F)" Message-ID: <1d2c7919-64d6-5e2e-9908-5729d4e561df@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 11:48:52 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Amir Goldstein Cc: fstests , Eryu Guan , Miklos Szeredi , Miao Xie List-ID: On 2018/10/16 18:07, Amir Goldstein Wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:32 AM zhangyi (F) wrote: >> >> Introduce a test case for fsck.overlay which runs on the underlying >> directories created by fsstress (contain a lot of fs objects) to >> find potential stability issue. >> > > Looks good. > Did it help you find any stability issues? > Not yet, it looks fine everytime I run this test, maybe could help to find in the future. :) Thanks, Yi.