All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Fitzhenry <tom@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc: phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] Add support for the Pine64 PinePhone Pro phone
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 07:00:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da905ff-482e-2d78-ec5d-3c2f9c99f613@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166231195330.2423948.5394487959576836993.b4-ty@sntech.de>

On 5/9/22 03:22, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:00:39 +1000, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
>> PinePhone Pro is a RK3399 based phone produced by Pine64.
>>
>> Add a basic DTS for it. This is a working base that will allow myself and
>> others to add more nodes.
>>
>> Relies on "dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add PinePhone Pro bindings"[0].
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add initial support for Pine64 PinePhone Pro
>        commit: 78a21c7d59520e72ebea667fe8745a4371d9fe86
> 
> 
> Why was the dt-binding addition missing?
> I've pulled the binding from v3 now.
> 
> While it is true that you should not resend patches just to add Acks,
> when re-sending a whole series that includes other changes it's still
> necessary to keep all patches together ;-)

Ah, I had misinterpreted previous advice on when it was necessary to 
repost patches.

I did wonder how maintainers would then discover the set of patches, and 
so included the "Relies on [..." text above.

I will ensure patch series are complete in future.

Thanks for your patience and review! :)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Fitzhenry <tom@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc: phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] Add support for the Pine64 PinePhone Pro phone
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 07:00:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da905ff-482e-2d78-ec5d-3c2f9c99f613@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166231195330.2423948.5394487959576836993.b4-ty@sntech.de>

On 5/9/22 03:22, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:00:39 +1000, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
>> PinePhone Pro is a RK3399 based phone produced by Pine64.
>>
>> Add a basic DTS for it. This is a working base that will allow myself and
>> others to add more nodes.
>>
>> Relies on "dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add PinePhone Pro bindings"[0].
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add initial support for Pine64 PinePhone Pro
>        commit: 78a21c7d59520e72ebea667fe8745a4371d9fe86
> 
> 
> Why was the dt-binding addition missing?
> I've pulled the binding from v3 now.
> 
> While it is true that you should not resend patches just to add Acks,
> when re-sending a whole series that includes other changes it's still
> necessary to keep all patches together ;-)

Ah, I had misinterpreted previous advice on when it was necessary to 
repost patches.

I did wonder how maintainers would then discover the set of patches, and 
so included the "Relies on [..." text above.

I will ensure patch series are complete in future.

Thanks for your patience and review! :)

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tom Fitzhenry <tom@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc: phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/1] Add support for the Pine64 PinePhone Pro phone
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 07:00:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da905ff-482e-2d78-ec5d-3c2f9c99f613@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <166231195330.2423948.5394487959576836993.b4-ty@sntech.de>

On 5/9/22 03:22, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:00:39 +1000, Tom Fitzhenry wrote:
>> PinePhone Pro is a RK3399 based phone produced by Pine64.
>>
>> Add a basic DTS for it. This is a working base that will allow myself and
>> others to add more nodes.
>>
>> Relies on "dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add PinePhone Pro bindings"[0].
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied, thanks!
> 
> [1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add initial support for Pine64 PinePhone Pro
>        commit: 78a21c7d59520e72ebea667fe8745a4371d9fe86
> 
> 
> Why was the dt-binding addition missing?
> I've pulled the binding from v3 now.
> 
> While it is true that you should not resend patches just to add Acks,
> when re-sending a whole series that includes other changes it's still
> necessary to keep all patches together ;-)

Ah, I had misinterpreted previous advice on when it was necessary to 
repost patches.

I did wonder how maintainers would then discover the set of patches, and 
so included the "Relies on [..." text above.

I will ensure patch series are complete in future.

Thanks for your patience and review! :)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-05 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-29  5:00 [PATCH v5 0/1] Add support for the Pine64 PinePhone Pro phone Tom Fitzhenry
2022-08-29  5:00 ` Tom Fitzhenry
2022-08-29  5:00 ` Tom Fitzhenry
2022-08-29  5:00 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add initial support for Pine64 PinePhone Pro Tom Fitzhenry
2022-08-29  5:00   ` Tom Fitzhenry
2022-08-29  5:00   ` Tom Fitzhenry
2022-09-04 17:22 ` [PATCH v5 0/1] Add support for the Pine64 PinePhone Pro phone Heiko Stuebner
2022-09-04 17:22   ` Heiko Stuebner
2022-09-04 17:22   ` Heiko Stuebner
2022-09-05 21:00   ` Tom Fitzhenry [this message]
2022-09-05 21:00     ` Tom Fitzhenry
2022-09-05 21:00     ` Tom Fitzhenry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1da905ff-482e-2d78-ec5d-3c2f9c99f613@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk \
    --to=tom@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.