From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:54:37 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] AT91 NAND om AT91SAM9260EK
In-Reply-To: <00d501c74e1b$a08bf9c0$01c4af0a@Glamdring>
References: <mailman.12584.1171099992.16820.u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
	<47403.127.0.0.1.1171139473.squirrel@localhost>
	<007601c74dfc$13ee7340$01c4af0a@Glamdring>
	<1defaf580702111004m6759e7f8yd03392a9ab7464c4@mail.gmail.com>
	<00a901c74e15$5174fe50$01c4af0a@Glamdring>
	<1defaf580702111223v525ad814n763b80a28b7c16c8@mail.gmail.com>
	<00d501c74e1b$a08bf9c0$01c4af0a@Glamdring>
Message-ID: <1defaf580702111254g9639957r46eb02f7bbd259f2@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 2/11/07, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@atmel.com> wrote:
> > On 2/11/07, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@atmel.com> wrote:
> >> Requesting me to modify the *contents* of a duplicated file because
> >> I want to have a single file I consider as an unreasonable request.
> >
> > I agree, but I don't recall anyone ever suggesting that (except that
> > my initial proposal did schedule some changes before the at91sam926x
> > board patches, but I also said that I was perfectly fine with doing
> > them later.)
> >
>
> No, Wolfgang implied that I could not move/split a file
> unless I promised to "clean" it up.

Oh, yes, I do recall that. But he did say "later", and that's what I'm
offering to do.

> I think we have basic agreement and we now should await
> the U-Boot maintainers reaction.

Agreed

Haavard