All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Nayan Deshmukh <nayan26deshmukh@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: christian.koenig@amd.com, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/scheduler: move idle entities to scheduler with less load
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:32:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e00384e-9741-3745-556a-bd13319d0706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180731103736.7813-5-nayan26deshmukh@gmail.com>

Am 31.07.2018 um 12:37 schrieb Nayan Deshmukh:
> This is the first attempt to move entities between schedulers to
> have dynamic load balancing. We just move entities with no jobs for
> now as moving the ones with jobs will lead to other compilcations
> like ensuring that the other scheduler does not remove a job from
> the current entity while we are moving.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nayan Deshmukh <nayan26deshmukh@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
> index c67f65ad8f15..f665a84d48ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
> @@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>   	if (!sched_job)
>   		return NULL;
>   
> +	sched_job->sched = sched;
> +	sched_job->s_fence->sched = sched;
>   	while ((entity->dependency = sched->ops->dependency(sched_job, entity)))
>   		if (drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb(entity))
>   			return NULL;
> @@ -570,16 +572,29 @@ drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>   void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job,
>   			       struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>   {
> -	struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = sched_job->sched;
> -	bool first = false;
> +	struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = entity->rq->sched;

Is the local "sched" variable actually still used?

Might be a good idea to drop that since we potentially changing the 
scheduler/rq.


> +	struct drm_sched_rq *rq = entity->rq;
> +	bool first = false, reschedule, idle;
>   
> -	trace_drm_sched_job(sched_job, entity);
> +	idle = entity->last_scheduled == NULL ||
> +		dma_fence_is_signaled(entity->last_scheduled);
> +	first = spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue) == 0;
> +	reschedule = idle && first && (entity->num_rq_list > 1);
> +
> +	if (reschedule) {
> +		rq = drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(entity);
> +		spin_lock(&entity->rq_lock);
> +		drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(entity->rq, entity);
> +		entity->rq = rq;
> +		spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
> +	}
>   
> +	trace_drm_sched_job(sched_job, entity);
>   	atomic_inc(&entity->rq->sched->num_jobs);
>   	first = spsc_queue_push(&entity->job_queue, &sched_job->queue_node);
>   
>   	/* first job wakes up scheduler */
> -	if (first) {
> +	if (first || reschedule) {

You can drop that extra check since we can only rescheduler when there 
wasn't any jobs in the entity.

Christian.

>   		/* Add the entity to the run queue */
>   		spin_lock(&entity->rq_lock);
>   		if (!entity->rq) {
> @@ -589,7 +604,7 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job,
>   		}
>   		drm_sched_rq_add_entity(entity->rq, entity);
>   		spin_unlock(&entity->rq_lock);
> -		drm_sched_wakeup(sched);
> +		drm_sched_wakeup(entity->rq->sched);
>   	}
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_entity_push_job);

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-31 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-31 10:37 [PATCH 0/4] drm/scheduler: add dynamic balancing Nayan Deshmukh
     [not found] ` <20180731103736.7813-1-nayan26deshmukh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-07-31 10:37   ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/scheduler: add a list of run queues to the entity Nayan Deshmukh
2018-07-31 10:37   ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/scheduler: add counter for total jobs in scheduler Nayan Deshmukh
2018-07-31 10:37   ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/scheduler: add new function to get least loaded sched Nayan Deshmukh
2018-07-31 11:27     ` Christian König
     [not found]       ` <1e24b45b-027c-2742-97eb-21054798218d-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2018-07-31 11:35         ` Nayan Deshmukh
2018-07-31 10:37   ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/scheduler: move idle entities to scheduler with less load Nayan Deshmukh
2018-07-31 11:32     ` Christian König [this message]
2018-07-31 11:38       ` Nayan Deshmukh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1e00384e-9741-3745-556a-bd13319d0706@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=nayan26deshmukh@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.