From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA46C432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AAC61059 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344156AbhIAR6Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 13:58:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50116 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235811AbhIAR6P (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 13:58:15 -0400 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050::465:103]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8581C061575; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:57:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H0BbH2L3szQjbT; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 19:57:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:date:message-id:from :from:references:subject:subject:received; s=mail20150812; t= 1630519032; bh=iiFuur+l1J/KhtNF4tWXIjcm5al7+tE31ONOdSHYhFA=; b=W Ucl38QZkuNwOmjivRpl2Cw2BZY6AsWXuQq0LlrHRfjcnCdZjz04Sfa6fDUpWB3PB XnyeEAo9F/yg17NOPt3np30Dmj1mdTCEUIIV7v0ZqFa6eqi7sq9QTaN25DKToYa1 bWlrgOr5e8aZk4/Q07kgRiNYalpO8LNNV0vI/LWK9rOur/zTzWRMysITj8TWoccT xuh0YIiXFHfrIQ8xDmOoHfJGSxUDWRo0Pr/ZA/Wm5fJFmdYMCBYhjm4rNEYxnZAR ZuD4ThNcjPhBT4vgNEYEhlGsk76+p7e2tz3QV/51HVS0hdDuSnMkIhULeiR8jwPD FrOMhAalDsvdqtCsqkdOQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1630519033; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FM1G0FVwaL8AnIvDuofXr9fZVFPakaZvOfxqNvVWMHE=; b=cU9AGLR/+v2+rsGl/tn2zoiJpFLHdPEU6Xawx80W0uVQ1c9NUNSCb1zx8qxPpq57c9CJuU 8RguYsttycJ/gV2iI9elU1HGvaZOzmYAKzHRnzUXvKUQtuQ9JJ9QYyS53movMWfxAv1/ad cRvm3L/NeS7r5HE7YNxkAVrwGes+EngY0to1dXarhcOMvCmJ3CsFVwQkEEWDON0R7mvajS 8IDvOddv3IZk4sja8YKvk+R/vgViI6ACj/QQHOiuGOGQjHW/u5mZUuXAvXfcnkfYAFCWfO iz15Y07pcihW8dHIU1i+GbDVEjcTNcvFBh8TvMi02amyDr/xBIiDMylHyqCb9Q== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] libata: Add ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_ON_AMD for Samsung 860 and 870 SSD. To: Damien Le Moal , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "hpa@redhat.com" Cc: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "hdegoede@redhat.com" References: <1876334901.51676.1630481868266@office.mailbox.org> From: Tor Vic Message-ID: <1e52352c-05e3-700a-58e7-462e1c0adbd1@mailbox.org> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:56:57 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6200D1898 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 01.09.21 08:13, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 2021/09/01 16:38, torvic9@mailbox.org wrote: >> (Sorry for not doing a proper reply) >> >> Hello, >> Noob here. >> I have a Samsung 860 Pro connected to a AMD X570 chipset mainboard and >> it just works flawlessly on 5.13 and 5.14. >> Are you sure that *every* 860/870 is concerned by this problem on >> *every* AMD controller? Isn't this too restrictive? >> Or am I simply missing something? > > Is you drive being initialized with NCQ enabled ? > > cat /sys/block/sdX/device/queue_depth ? Samsung 860 Pro: $ cat /sys/block/sda/device/queue_depth 32 Samsung 860 Evo: $ cat /sys/block/sdb/device/queue_depth 32 > >> >> Thanks, >> Tor >> > >