From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756544AbbDGNcg (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:32:36 -0400 Received: from ip4-83-240-67-251.cust.nbox.cz ([83.240.67.251]:54365 "EHLO ip4-83-240-18-248.cust.nbox.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754045AbbDGMwG (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:52:06 -0400 From: Jiri Slaby To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , "David S. Miller" , Jiri Slaby Subject: [PATCH 3.12 004/155] rds: avoid potential stack overflow Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:49:33 +0200 Message-Id: <1e9efae9ba9eed9499d1ced2366d85995b6cf1fa.1428411003.git.jslaby@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.3.4 In-Reply-To: <9a548862b8a26cbccc14f2c6c9c3688813d8d14b.1428411003.git.jslaby@suse.cz> References: <9a548862b8a26cbccc14f2c6c9c3688813d8d14b.1428411003.git.jslaby@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arnd Bergmann 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. =============== [ Upstream commit f862e07cf95d5b62a5fc5e981dd7d0dbaf33a501 ] The rds_iw_update_cm_id function stores a large 'struct rds_sock' object on the stack in order to pass a pair of addresses. This happens to just fit withint the 1024 byte stack size warning limit on x86, but just exceed that limit on ARM, which gives us this warning: net/rds/iw_rdma.c:200:1: warning: the frame size of 1056 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] As the use of this large variable is basically bogus, we can rearrange the code to not do that. Instead of passing an rds socket into rds_iw_get_device, we now just pass the two addresses that we have available in rds_iw_update_cm_id, and we change rds_iw_get_mr accordingly, to create two address structures on the stack there. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Sowmini Varadhan Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby --- net/rds/iw_rdma.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/rds/iw_rdma.c b/net/rds/iw_rdma.c index a817705ce2d0..dba8d0864f18 100644 --- a/net/rds/iw_rdma.c +++ b/net/rds/iw_rdma.c @@ -88,7 +88,9 @@ static unsigned int rds_iw_unmap_fastreg_list(struct rds_iw_mr_pool *pool, int *unpinned); static void rds_iw_destroy_fastreg(struct rds_iw_mr_pool *pool, struct rds_iw_mr *ibmr); -static int rds_iw_get_device(struct rds_sock *rs, struct rds_iw_device **rds_iwdev, struct rdma_cm_id **cm_id) +static int rds_iw_get_device(struct sockaddr_in *src, struct sockaddr_in *dst, + struct rds_iw_device **rds_iwdev, + struct rdma_cm_id **cm_id) { struct rds_iw_device *iwdev; struct rds_iw_cm_id *i_cm_id; @@ -112,15 +114,15 @@ static int rds_iw_get_device(struct rds_sock *rs, struct rds_iw_device **rds_iwd src_addr->sin_port, dst_addr->sin_addr.s_addr, dst_addr->sin_port, - rs->rs_bound_addr, - rs->rs_bound_port, - rs->rs_conn_addr, - rs->rs_conn_port); + src->sin_addr.s_addr, + src->sin_port, + dst->sin_addr.s_addr, + dst->sin_port); #ifdef WORKING_TUPLE_DETECTION - if (src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == rs->rs_bound_addr && - src_addr->sin_port == rs->rs_bound_port && - dst_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == rs->rs_conn_addr && - dst_addr->sin_port == rs->rs_conn_port) { + if (src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == src->sin_addr.s_addr && + src_addr->sin_port == src->sin_port && + dst_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == dst->sin_addr.s_addr && + dst_addr->sin_port == dst->sin_port) { #else /* FIXME - needs to compare the local and remote * ipaddr/port tuple, but the ipaddr is the only @@ -128,7 +130,7 @@ static int rds_iw_get_device(struct rds_sock *rs, struct rds_iw_device **rds_iwd * zero'ed. It doesn't appear to be properly populated * during connection setup... */ - if (src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == rs->rs_bound_addr) { + if (src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr == src->sin_addr.s_addr) { #endif spin_unlock_irq(&iwdev->spinlock); *rds_iwdev = iwdev; @@ -180,19 +182,13 @@ int rds_iw_update_cm_id(struct rds_iw_device *rds_iwdev, struct rdma_cm_id *cm_i { struct sockaddr_in *src_addr, *dst_addr; struct rds_iw_device *rds_iwdev_old; - struct rds_sock rs; struct rdma_cm_id *pcm_id; int rc; src_addr = (struct sockaddr_in *)&cm_id->route.addr.src_addr; dst_addr = (struct sockaddr_in *)&cm_id->route.addr.dst_addr; - rs.rs_bound_addr = src_addr->sin_addr.s_addr; - rs.rs_bound_port = src_addr->sin_port; - rs.rs_conn_addr = dst_addr->sin_addr.s_addr; - rs.rs_conn_port = dst_addr->sin_port; - - rc = rds_iw_get_device(&rs, &rds_iwdev_old, &pcm_id); + rc = rds_iw_get_device(src_addr, dst_addr, &rds_iwdev_old, &pcm_id); if (rc) rds_iw_remove_cm_id(rds_iwdev, cm_id); @@ -598,9 +594,17 @@ void *rds_iw_get_mr(struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned long nents, struct rds_iw_device *rds_iwdev; struct rds_iw_mr *ibmr = NULL; struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id; + struct sockaddr_in src = { + .sin_addr.s_addr = rs->rs_bound_addr, + .sin_port = rs->rs_bound_port, + }; + struct sockaddr_in dst = { + .sin_addr.s_addr = rs->rs_conn_addr, + .sin_port = rs->rs_conn_port, + }; int ret; - ret = rds_iw_get_device(rs, &rds_iwdev, &cm_id); + ret = rds_iw_get_device(&src, &dst, &rds_iwdev, &cm_id); if (ret || !cm_id) { ret = -ENODEV; goto out; -- 2.3.4