From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] s390: virtio: support protected virtualization References: <20190426183245.37939-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20190503115511.17a1f6d1.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Juergen Gross Message-ID: <1eb4b501-b22a-bba6-d4f9-68a278f6bd64@suse.com> Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 12:03:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190503115511.17a1f6d1.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Archive: List-Post: To: Cornelia Huck , Halil Pasic Cc: Vasily Gorbik , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth , Claudio Imbrenda , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Ott , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Farhan Ali , Eric Farman , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christoph Hellwig , Martin Schwidefsky , Viktor Mihajlovski , Janosch Frank List-ID: On 03/05/2019 11:55, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:35 +0200 > Halil Pasic wrote: > >> Enhanced virtualization protection technology may require the use of >> bounce buffers for I/O. While support for this was built into the virtio >> core, virtio-ccw wasn't changed accordingly. >> >> Some background on technology (not part of this series) and the >> terminology used. >> >> * Protected Virtualization (PV): Uuh, you are aware that "PV" in virtualization environment is used as "Para-Virtualization" (e.g. in Xen) today? I believe you are risking a major mis-understanding here. Juergen