From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A3FC433F5 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDF360F4C for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230333AbhJaWW1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:22:27 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:31561 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229982AbhJaWW0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:22:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635718793; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9lPPZrT4HkW0yreYUc+o8IFGdpWCwnC6KSSIpRHe7JA=; b=UN1aIjoo1khEL1VZ0jKqE0/c0/wRz7M85MO1j5oBSQZd1Vmm/Y148Ua6HjLdJO7kqa0Ff4 1YPc6GGT6ycbs4YJONBmvluqpm6h9L2DMtaVrdfI2qGaaIvpMBdp2K9BrVNBXx6LxaEsP8 b46gfhafpgMxHi2A+nEPiYl+zWBgblg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-303-B-0MMCdFPt2mLeVjPh4hvA-1; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:19:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: B-0MMCdFPt2mLeVjPh4hvA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDEB80668E; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from starship (unknown [10.40.194.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F213B19C59; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1f2fb5f18b0f0bcee71c9d506769dd1357273444.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] KVM: VMX: Wake vCPU when delivering posted IRQ even if vCPU == this vCPU From: Maxim Levitsky To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:19:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-41-seanjc@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 15:30 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Lastly, this aligns the non-nested and nested usage of triggering posted > > > interrupts, and will allow for additional cleanups. > > > > It also aligns with SVM a little bit more (especially given patch 35), > > doesn't it? > > Yes, aligning VMX and SVM APICv behavior as much as possible is definitely a goal > of this series, though I suspect I failed to state that anywhere. > Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky Best regards, Maxim Levitky From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1D8C433EF for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5224360EE9 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:20:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5224360EE9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wpBzXfQKbw3XptQ3G/1RsNxUmsMnHQo+ZDg5dap2gPk=; b=bjbqVyrLOUFMdB Q8iuxRaoh9477bpt0JUOB9mCISfiM3Kef8/uRJWWEc50g/n3XXC6SGQUL1nWfbDNMkxQu24umilPw xY5Ato6ZoU6xhtKswrbVGE0fISzehzyr7DvJkWL6RyojXVu2ybMmB6ydolaIGXiw/M6R9gKSYS1Ti 0YvxzCsjDvvdfRaACfjcyNyXqAzuKQsTyNbq2FKQd5Zwohrv2o1SxIzFx8G4JQ06OqAw/T4EtHe27 /9o4U2SFBnic7j3t2KKbRG4TOqd1uP3DBsarilz75kFf3wyAWhMye7dfQ21MjTGqOgtphR4un9dQ1 wUzy3EbDjrI6tmJMZfZQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhJBG-00EnZ2-Aj; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:58 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhJBD-00EnXM-6s for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:56 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635718794; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9lPPZrT4HkW0yreYUc+o8IFGdpWCwnC6KSSIpRHe7JA=; b=VMxJ+KILKFIH7TfCHQPHcVBUq6wUjyUCBbxx47xhKkpwzpaGqTwQwyBu8I6NphZ6FDFw64 PHNkhBdqiadxYuyN8e3b4IOoqBJoJXoNHhjFPHwY9sGnRjBhqTSa5F8sI/RbBpYfpGmr88 hqtgGvXHFsh5NatSKRXcSivykcxIH9g= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-303-B-0MMCdFPt2mLeVjPh4hvA-1; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:19:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: B-0MMCdFPt2mLeVjPh4hvA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDEB80668E; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from starship (unknown [10.40.194.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F213B19C59; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1f2fb5f18b0f0bcee71c9d506769dd1357273444.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] KVM: VMX: Wake vCPU when delivering posted IRQ even if vCPU == this vCPU From: Maxim Levitsky To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:19:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-41-seanjc@google.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211031_151955_365948_AD59810E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.89 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 15:30 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Lastly, this aligns the non-nested and nested usage of triggering posted > > > interrupts, and will allow for additional cleanups. > > > > It also aligns with SVM a little bit more (especially given patch 35), > > doesn't it? > > Yes, aligning VMX and SVM APICv behavior as much as possible is definitely a goal > of this series, though I suspect I failed to state that anywhere. > Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky Best regards, Maxim Levitky _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9EBC433F5 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD04860E0B for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:21:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org CD04860E0B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ML1uwocoMcL6+8Z8nw/lGqgGst731w1GLL07Iu5fY5A=; b=Rzinc38kUt/TsS qCPWflgSa3vIA+SlLdNvc2Qd6pOIsv0OmqtL6YppmqC8mMihgPGitzfL6aA95MOkestzVBwHhROvQ xCh4cD0sNNmEIbbLlGKH5yUu2dRkQtvtwPJydVMoyZxPocQaFIwZi4SMmdQx9b4xIFLjVjYVCKJcG 6rmALM+Va0Tb0kL5V/wScWhCiOVGsPP1mjvbW6k+9PcGkEh38rWR7wnUq8m8gBuLFwHs1qq/fYt8P sGtD5a+AtS6WGTv6CyGM4frI4Ptfmg54LQx+4SChexpmaK/fOv+f2d9kGgJkD8AbpegcBygqk5ZJo cccwBbgA88cV5U0QlEeg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhJBJ-00EnZh-Bn; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:20:01 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhJBE-00EnY0-Lc for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635718795; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9lPPZrT4HkW0yreYUc+o8IFGdpWCwnC6KSSIpRHe7JA=; b=bczl6QSYJwgEbkcwUvqt3ED0xgsNb7n2e1zrqWGBHE8xuExiSOKeV5/cj3wKzx5oPrEDH4 oJE5K0zh8o8E1M1sno1LCqxbWlMDskzHy1l1VCFG8isD5iF7zWqZsDIS14Bnnp06eRwrJP HuQh/cbcBcj7nUPRQ4//qO9Y7FJQOQg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-303-B-0MMCdFPt2mLeVjPh4hvA-1; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:19:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: B-0MMCdFPt2mLeVjPh4hvA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDEB80668E; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from starship (unknown [10.40.194.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F213B19C59; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1f2fb5f18b0f0bcee71c9d506769dd1357273444.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] KVM: VMX: Wake vCPU when delivering posted IRQ even if vCPU == this vCPU From: Maxim Levitsky To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:19:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-41-seanjc@google.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211031_151956_810995_3D643014 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.80 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 15:30 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Lastly, this aligns the non-nested and nested usage of triggering posted > > > interrupts, and will allow for additional cleanups. > > > > It also aligns with SVM a little bit more (especially given patch 35), > > doesn't it? > > Yes, aligning VMX and SVM APICv behavior as much as possible is definitely a goal > of this series, though I suspect I failed to state that anywhere. > Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky Best regards, Maxim Levitky _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56832C433FE for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 21:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D5060F36 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 21:40:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 06D5060F36 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97594B11C; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:40:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@redhat.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljPCQGXPvmNb; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:40:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EEF4B25B; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:40:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388674B1A2 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:19:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vloH8NJcs-Ai for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:19:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C91F4B177 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:19:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635718795; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9lPPZrT4HkW0yreYUc+o8IFGdpWCwnC6KSSIpRHe7JA=; b=bczl6QSYJwgEbkcwUvqt3ED0xgsNb7n2e1zrqWGBHE8xuExiSOKeV5/cj3wKzx5oPrEDH4 oJE5K0zh8o8E1M1sno1LCqxbWlMDskzHy1l1VCFG8isD5iF7zWqZsDIS14Bnnp06eRwrJP HuQh/cbcBcj7nUPRQ4//qO9Y7FJQOQg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-303-B-0MMCdFPt2mLeVjPh4hvA-1; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 18:19:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: B-0MMCdFPt2mLeVjPh4hvA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDEB80668E; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from starship (unknown [10.40.194.243]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F213B19C59; Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1f2fb5f18b0f0bcee71c9d506769dd1357273444.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] KVM: VMX: Wake vCPU when delivering posted IRQ even if vCPU == this vCPU From: Maxim Levitsky To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 00:19:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-41-seanjc@google.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:40:12 -0400 Cc: Cornelia Huck , Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Atish Patra , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Claudio Imbrenda , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Janosch Frank , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , Huacai Chen , Christian Borntraeger , Aleksandar Markovic , Albert Ou , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , David Matlack , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Anup Patel , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt , kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 15:30 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Lastly, this aligns the non-nested and nested usage of triggering posted > > > interrupts, and will allow for additional cleanups. > > > > It also aligns with SVM a little bit more (especially given patch 35), > > doesn't it? > > Yes, aligning VMX and SVM APICv behavior as much as possible is definitely a goal > of this series, though I suspect I failed to state that anywhere. > Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky Best regards, Maxim Levitky _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Levitsky Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:19:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 40/43] KVM: VMX: Wake vCPU when delivering posted IRQ even if vCPU == this vCPU Message-Id: <1f2fb5f18b0f0bcee71c9d506769dd1357273444.camel@redhat.com> List-Id: References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> <20211009021236.4122790-41-seanjc@google.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Atish Patra , David Hildenbrand , Cornelia Huck , Claudio Imbrenda , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 15:30 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Lastly, this aligns the non-nested and nested usage of triggering posted > > > interrupts, and will allow for additional cleanups. > > > > It also aligns with SVM a little bit more (especially given patch 35), > > doesn't it? > > Yes, aligning VMX and SVM APICv behavior as much as possible is definitely a goal > of this series, though I suspect I failed to state that anywhere. > Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky Best regards, Maxim Levitky