From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5B2C5517A for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C682067B for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="foIMzsTE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730249AbgKJDXt (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 22:23:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42144 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729243AbgKJDXs (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 22:23:48 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 973B7C0613CF; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:23:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=buwWJZNpFl/2hjLEi5QBJhf23r0pjdlTKDNQzjr9ykw=; b=foIMzsTE/2p6h/eMeUIpm9e2Ox yA3VfOLF+anaejHlyNq8aQpqeQEHVlLyHmwIrJ7ImUlCgWb7Wfi+8i0Y0wyvBWrpD9I/WaAKIpZHe pV0dJnJf1R9g6pv8DXE1tssmLAPE9Yb5GiUjHf31rjGc3gI2TkCxvQOYLQPGmLwVvOM/LAl7Tltik 1JAadD7WsNBI2OzxExlrTR+PgOiRCjfh01TdHsSL3tfaFeIf1CF+cGVHvvrVbA9Zwvz/ybMP4fe7m 9uudvjzuqEPewKuOuUi2qEElTAtbxBBNf2a6HrHCpRer/rbIDKxwVFu9kX2+yLUr9m2V9W51HQ9aX OHqByg5Q==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::662d] by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kcKG1-0005DV-Fa; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 03:23:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/26] Make reporting-bugs easier to grasp and yet more detailed To: Thorsten Leemhuis , Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <7910cf25-4aa9-e33d-704c-33ab91ab713b@leemhuis.info> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <1f71cf5a-4afb-22b5-c528-aeb026fc6ce9@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:23:41 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7910cf25-4aa9-e33d-704c-33ab91ab713b@leemhuis.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/9/20 3:01 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Lo! > > Am 01.10.20 um 10:39 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: >> This series rewrites the "how to report bugs to the Linux kernel maintainers" >> document to make it more straight forward and the essence easier to grasp. At >> the same time make the text provide a lot more details about the process in form >> of a reference section, so users that want or need to know them have them at >> hand. >> >> The goal of this rewrite: improve the quality of the bug reports and reduce the >> number of reports that get ignored. This was motivated by many reports of poor >> quality the main author of the rewrite stumped upon when he was tracking >> regressions. > > So, now that those weeks with the merge window, the OSS & ELC Europe, and this US election thing are behind us it seems like a good time to ask: > > How to move on with this? > > @Jon: I'd be really appreciate to hear your thoughts on this. > > @Randy: Thx again for all suggestions and pointing out many spelling mistakes, that helped a lot! You didn't reply to some of the patches, which made me wonder: did you not look at those (which is totally fine) or was there nothing to point out? And what I'd really like to know: what are you thinking about the whole thing? Hi, I looked at all of the patches in the series but did not have any comments on the ones where I didn't reply. thanks. -- ~Randy