All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/35] s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:59:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fb4da22-bab4-abe3-847b-5a7d79d84774@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207113958.7320-6-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

>  
>  /*
> @@ -1086,12 +1106,16 @@ static inline pte_t ptep_get_and_clear_full(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  					    unsigned long addr,
>  					    pte_t *ptep, int full)
>  {
> +	pte_t res;

Empty line missing.

>  	if (full) {
> -		pte_t pte = *ptep;
> +		res = *ptep;
>  		*ptep = __pte(_PAGE_INVALID);
> -		return pte;
> +	} else {
> +		res = ptep_xchg_lazy(mm, addr, ptep, __pte(_PAGE_INVALID));
>  	}
> -	return ptep_xchg_lazy(mm, addr, ptep, __pte(_PAGE_INVALID));
> +	if (mm_is_protected(mm) && pte_present(res))
> +		uv_convert_from_secure(pte_val(res) & PAGE_MASK);
> +	return res;
>  }

[...]

> +int uv_make_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, void *uvcb);
> +int uv_convert_from_secure(unsigned long paddr);
> +
> +static inline int uv_convert_to_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr)
> +{
> +	struct uv_cb_cts uvcb = {
> +		.header.cmd = UVC_CMD_CONV_TO_SEC_STOR,
> +		.header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
> +		.guest_handle = gmap->guest_handle,
> +		.gaddr = gaddr,
> +	};
> +
> +	return uv_make_secure(gmap, gaddr, &uvcb);
> +}

I'd actually suggest to name everything that eats a gmap "gmap_",

e.g., "gmap_make_secure()"

[...]

>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST) ||                          \
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
> index a06a628a88da..15ac598a3d8d 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>  #include <linux/sizes.h>
>  #include <linux/bitmap.h>
>  #include <linux/memblock.h>
> +#include <linux/pagemap.h>
> +#include <linux/swap.h>
>  #include <asm/facility.h>
>  #include <asm/sections.h>
>  #include <asm/uv.h>
> @@ -99,4 +101,174 @@ void adjust_to_uv_max(unsigned long *vmax)
>  	if (prot_virt_host && *vmax > uv_info.max_sec_stor_addr)
>  		*vmax = uv_info.max_sec_stor_addr;
>  }
> +
> +static int __uv_pin_shared(unsigned long paddr)
> +{
> +	struct uv_cb_cfs uvcb = {
> +		.header.cmd	= UVC_CMD_PIN_PAGE_SHARED,
> +		.header.len	= sizeof(uvcb),
> +		.paddr		= paddr,

please drop all the superfluous spaces (just as in the other uv calls).

> +	};
> +
> +	if (uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	return 0;
> +}

[...]

> +static int make_secure_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct conv_params *params = data;
> +	pte_t entry = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> +	struct page *page;
> +	int expected, rc = 0;
> +
> +	if (!pte_present(entry))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +	if (pte_val(entry) & (_PAGE_INVALID | _PAGE_PROTECT))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	page = pte_page(entry);
> +	if (page != params->page)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	if (PageWriteback(page))
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +	expected = expected_page_refs(page);

I do wonder if we could factor out expected_page_refs() and reuse from
other sources ...

I do wonder about huge page backing of guests, and especially
hpage_nr_pages(page) used in mm/migrate.c:expected_page_refs(). But I
can spot some hugepage exclusion below ... This needs comments.

> +	if (!page_ref_freeze(page, expected))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	set_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags);

Can we please document somewhere how PG_arch_1 is used on s390x? (page)

"The generic code guarantees that this bit is cleared for a page when it
first is entered into the page cache" - should not be an issue, right?

> +	rc = uv_call(0, (u64)params->uvcb);
> +	page_ref_unfreeze(page, expected);
> +	if (rc)
> +		rc = (params->uvcb->rc == 0x10a) ? -ENXIO : -EINVAL;
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Requests the Ultravisor to make a page accessible to a guest.
> + * If it's brought in the first time, it will be cleared. If
> + * it has been exported before, it will be decrypted and integrity
> + * checked.
> + *
> + * @gmap: Guest mapping
> + * @gaddr: Guest 2 absolute address to be imported

I'd just drop the the (incomplete) parameter documentation, everybody
reaching this point should now what a gmap and what a gaddr is ...

> + */
> +int uv_make_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, void *uvcb)
> +{
> +	struct conv_params params = { .uvcb = uvcb };
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	unsigned long uaddr;
> +	int rc, local_drain = 0;
> +
> +again:
> +	rc = -EFAULT;
> +	down_read(&gmap->mm->mmap_sem);
> +
> +	uaddr = __gmap_translate(gmap, gaddr);
> +	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(uaddr))
> +		goto out;
> +	vma = find_vma(gmap->mm, uaddr);
> +	if (!vma)
> +		goto out;
> +	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
> +		goto out;

Hah there it is! How is it enforced on upper layers/excluded? Will
hpage=true fail with prot virt? What if a guest is not a protected guest
but wants to sue huge pages? This needs comments/patch description.

> +
> +	rc = -ENXIO;
> +	params.page = follow_page(vma, uaddr, FOLL_WRITE | FOLL_NOWAIT);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(params.page))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	lock_page(params.page);
> +	rc = apply_to_page_range(gmap->mm, uaddr, PAGE_SIZE, make_secure_pte, &params);

Ehm, isn't it just always a single page?

> +	unlock_page(params.page);
> +out:
> +	up_read(&gmap->mm->mmap_sem);
> +
> +	if (rc == -EBUSY) {
> +		if (local_drain) {
> +			lru_add_drain_all();
> +			return -EAGAIN;
> +		}
> +		lru_add_drain();

comments please why that is performed.

> +		local_drain = 1;
> +		goto again;

Could we end up in an endless loop?

> +	} else if (rc == -ENXIO) {
> +		if (gmap_fault(gmap, gaddr, FAULT_FLAG_WRITE))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +	}
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_make_secure);
> +
> +/**
> + * To be called with the page locked or with an extra reference!
> + */
> +int arch_make_page_accessible(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	int rc = 0;
> +
> +	if (PageHuge(page))
> +		return 0;

Ah, another instance. Comment please why

> +
> +	if (!test_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags))
> +		return 0;

"Can you describe the meaning of this bit with three words"? Or a couple
more? :D

"once upon a time, the page was secure and still might be" ?
"the page is secure and therefore inaccessible" ?

> +
> +	rc = __uv_pin_shared(page_to_phys(page));
> +	if (!rc) {
> +		clear_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	rc = uv_convert_from_secure(page_to_phys(page));
> +	if (!rc) {
> +		clear_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_make_page_accessible);
> +
>  #endif
> 

More code comments would be highly appreciated!

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-14 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-07 11:39 [PATCH 00/35] KVM: s390: Add support for protected VMs Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 01/35] mm:gup/writeback: add callbacks for inaccessible pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 17:27   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 17:27     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-11 11:26     ` Will Deacon
2020-02-11 11:43       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-11 11:43         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-13 14:48       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-13 14:48         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18 16:02         ` Will Deacon
2020-02-13 19:56     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-13 19:56       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-13 20:13       ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-13 20:13         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-13 20:46         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-13 20:46           ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-17 20:55         ` Tom Lendacky
2020-02-17 20:55           ` Tom Lendacky
2020-02-17 21:14           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-17 21:14             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 18:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-10 18:28     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 18:43       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-10 18:51         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-18  3:36   ` Tian, Kevin
2020-02-18  6:44     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 02/35] KVM: s390/interrupt: do not pin adapter interrupt pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 12:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-10 18:38     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 19:33       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-11  9:23         ` [PATCH v2 RFC] " Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-12 11:52           ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-12 12:16           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-12 12:22             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-12 12:47               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-12 12:39           ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-12 12:44             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-12 13:07               ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 18:56     ` [PATCH 02/35] KVM: s390/interrupt: do not pin adapter interrupt Ulrich Weigand
2020-02-10 18:56       ` Ulrich Weigand
2020-02-10 12:40   ` [PATCH 02/35] KVM: s390/interrupt: do not pin adapter interrupt pages David Hildenbrand
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 03/35] s390/protvirt: introduce host side setup Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10  9:42   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-10  9:48     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 11:54   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 12:14     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 12:31       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 12:38   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-10 12:54     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 04/35] s390/protvirt: add ultravisor initialization Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 10:25   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 10:33     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 10:34       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 05/35] s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-12 13:42   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-13  7:43     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-13  8:44       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-14 17:59   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-02-14 21:17     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 06/35] s390/mm: add (non)secure page access exceptions handlers Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 18:05   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 19:59     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 07/35] KVM: s390: add new variants of UV CALL Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 14:34   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-07 15:03     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 12:16   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 12:22     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 18:28   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 20:13     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 08/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add initial lifecycle handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 16:32   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-10  8:34     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-08 14:54   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-10 11:43     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 11:45       ` [PATCH/RFC] KVM: s390: protvirt: pass-through rc and rrc Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 12:06         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 12:29           ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-10 12:50           ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 12:56             ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-11  8:48               ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-13  8:43                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 18:39   ` [PATCH 08/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add initial lifecycle handling David Hildenbrand
2020-02-14 21:22     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 09/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add KVM api documentation Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-08 14:57   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-10 12:26     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 12:57       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 13:02         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 10/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Secure memory is not mergeable Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 11/35] KVM: s390/mm: Make pages accessible before destroying the guest Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-14 18:40   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 12/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Handle SE notification interceptions Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 13/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Instruction emulation Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 14/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add interruption injection controls Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 15/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Implement interruption injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 10:03   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 16/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add SCLP interrupt handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-11 12:00   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-11 20:06     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 17/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Handle spec exception loops Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 18/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add new gprs location handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 19/35] KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 20/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: handle secure guest prefix pages Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-13  8:37   ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 21/35] KVM: s390/mm: handle guest unpin events Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 14:58   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-11 13:21     ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 22/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Write sthyi data to instruction data area Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 23/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: STSI handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-08 15:01   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-11 10:55   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 24/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: disallow one_reg Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 17:53   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 18:34     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-11  8:27       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 25/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Only sync fmt4 registers Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-09 15:50   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-10  9:33     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-11 10:51   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-11 12:59     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 26/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add program exception injection Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-09 15:52   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 27/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add diag 308 subcode 8 - 10 handling Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 28/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: UV calls diag308 0, 1 Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-09 16:03   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-10  8:45     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 29/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Report CPU state to Ultravisor Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 30/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Support cmd 5 operation state Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 31/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV debug trace Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 13:22   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 13:40     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 32/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Mask PSW interrupt bits for interception 104 and 112 Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-09 16:07   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-10 13:28   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 13:48     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 14:47       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 33/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: do not inject interrupts after start Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 34/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: Add UV cpu reset calls Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-10 13:17   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-10 13:25     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-07 11:39 ` [PATCH 35/35] DOCUMENTATION: Protected virtual machine introduction and IPL Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-11 12:23   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-11 20:03     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-12 11:03       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-12 11:49         ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-12 11:01   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-12 16:36     ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1fb4da22-bab4-abe3-847b-5a7d79d84774@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.