From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <2620524.eH6OsgKU20@wirbelwind> From: Philippe Gerum Message-ID: <1fead1f4-6be5-f057-f84e-7a9c8f4f9b9e@xenomai.org> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:17:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2620524.eH6OsgKU20@wirbelwind> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: steven.seeger@nasa.gov, xenomai@xenomai.org Hi Steven, On 11/22/2017 05:49 PM, Steven Seeger wrote: > Philippe, as we have previously discussed I am willing to take over the PPC i- > pipe maintenance on my personal time if it will help. Thanks, that would be great. My only issue is right > now the only PPC board I have in my posseession is an 8548-based board. I > might be able to borrow some 405 and 440-based boards from work if needed. Of > course, we can always depend on the grateful Xenomai users for test and > feedback. :) > I have remote access to many ppc boards and could help here. This said 85xx, 40x and 44x already cover much of the ppc32 scope running Xenomai - maybe adding mpc52xx would be good, I have one here. I don't see much traction these days for Xenomai over ppc64, so I'm not even sure whether this port is still relevant. > I am not sure my group is going to pursue RTNET otherwise I would have been > happy to help there. I think negotations are still open on that one, though. > > If we ever get around to releasing my microblaze i-pipe patch then I am happy > to maintain that as well. :) Feel free to email me privately if you want to > discuss. Ok. > > I really miss Gilles and maybe I can help carry on his memory in some small > way. Hopefully he is in heaven where there are no geode CPUs to chase FPU bugs > on :) -- Philippe.