From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ABDC433EF for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A5F61C48 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229901AbhKOHWV (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 02:22:21 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:9471 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229713AbhKOHWA (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 02:22:00 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10168"; a="220602224" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,235,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="220602224" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Nov 2021 23:18:58 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,235,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="585144635" Received: from mkrawczy-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.254.108]) ([10.249.254.108]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Nov 2021 23:18:56 -0800 Message-ID: <1ff1389b-bf4c-cd09-8bfd-d4303d100eee@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:18:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes + one missed next for 5.16-rc1 Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Torvalds , Dave Airlie Cc: Matthew Auld , Ashutosh Dixit , Rodrigo Vivi , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel , LKML References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/14/21 22:19, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 1:00 PM Dave Airlie wrote: >> i915 will no longer be x86-64 only in theory, since Intel now produces >> PCIe graphics cards using the same hw designs. > Well, at least in my tree, it still has the "depends on X86", along > with several other x86-only things (like "select INTEL_GTT", which is > also x86-only) > > So by the time that non-x86 theory becomes reality, hopefully the i915 > people will also have figured out how to do the cache flushing > properly. > > And hopefully that "do it properly" ends up being simply that the > particular configuration that ends up being portable simply doesn't > need to do it at all and can statically just not build it, > sidestepping the issue entirely. > > Fingers crossed. For non-x86 / discrete graphics, plan is only coherent mappings, although the "Just not build it" part hasn't been properly figured out yet I guess. But point taken. Thanks, /Thomas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F77C433EF for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE12B61B2C for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:19:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org AE12B61B2C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190C06E2DF; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A06C26E2DF for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:18:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10168"; a="232113169" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,235,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="232113169" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Nov 2021 23:18:58 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,235,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="585144635" Received: from mkrawczy-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.254.108]) ([10.249.254.108]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Nov 2021 23:18:56 -0800 Message-ID: <1ff1389b-bf4c-cd09-8bfd-d4303d100eee@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:18:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes + one missed next for 5.16-rc1 Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Torvalds , Dave Airlie References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Vetter , LKML , dri-devel , Ashutosh Dixit , Matthew Auld , Rodrigo Vivi Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On 11/14/21 22:19, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 1:00 PM Dave Airlie wrote: >> i915 will no longer be x86-64 only in theory, since Intel now produces >> PCIe graphics cards using the same hw designs. > Well, at least in my tree, it still has the "depends on X86", along > with several other x86-only things (like "select INTEL_GTT", which is > also x86-only) > > So by the time that non-x86 theory becomes reality, hopefully the i915 > people will also have figured out how to do the cache flushing > properly. > > And hopefully that "do it properly" ends up being simply that the > particular configuration that ends up being portable simply doesn't > need to do it at all and can statically just not build it, > sidestepping the issue entirely. > > Fingers crossed. For non-x86 / discrete graphics, plan is only coherent mappings, although the "Just not build it" part hasn't been properly figured out yet I guess. But point taken. Thanks, /Thomas