From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lists@haller-berlin.de (Stefan Haller) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Force using Tcl/Tk 8.4 on Mac OS X Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:56:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1jogy2y.tfhl6g1eq9mylM%lists@haller-berlin.de> References: <87r5h5pdwz.fsf@fox.patthoyts.tk> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org (Shawn O Pearce), dsteffen@apple.com (Daniel A Steffen) To: patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net (Pat Thoyts), das@users.sourceforge.net (Daniel A. Steffen) X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 07 21:56:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot4HD-0002QV-Bz for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:56:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758114Ab0IGT4N (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:56:13 -0400 Received: from mail.ableton.net ([62.96.12.115]:39036 "EHLO mail.ableton.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757970Ab0IGT4M (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:56:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=haller-berlin.de; s=mail_2009081900; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:Cc:To; bh=R3Ow87yoKQBE5cc0mncGLAmC9A/owkiK/GTx437m3aQ=; b=Yxe6bcgicDN3gNpuHm1xP+cppi51krwyxDcwBRy/TPIvStUYqPGvj0Xx1RIgrAxMs0i+JMBJYWNiwCbqbq2z4u+amysJQbeRCqA7BABo05uufK5usHIWPPDFLXMQpwVn2fxcqqRquWrloJ5XrZNRPArYQhLCGzdPqWOvtIdxPLc=; Received: from [10.1.15.235] by mail.ableton.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot48Q-0006wM-AM; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:47:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r5h5pdwz.fsf@fox.patthoyts.tk> User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.3 (Mac OS X version 10.6.4 (x86)) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pat Thoyts wrote: > This removes the Cmd-J accelerator from the "Revert Changes" menu > item. I assume that just changing the menu command to > {after idle [list do_revert_selection]} > doesn't work either? No, but "after 100" does for me; "after 10" does not, and "after 50" does some of the time. I'm not sure if this would be suitable as a workaround then. -Stefan -- Stefan Haller Berlin, Germany http://www.haller-berlin.de/