From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:45 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:31872 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20010817.145927.21593568.davem@redhat.com> To: riel@conectiva.com.br Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, tpepper@vato.org, f5ibh@db0bm.ampr.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH] From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20010816.160208.55508845.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rik van Riel Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:46:20 -0300 (BRST) On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > I don't recall you saying anything about "make sure to tell the > maintainers" I'll remember your attitude for if I ever have to touch the network code ;) If Linus scribbled all over the network code I would have to accept it if it were a kernel wide cleanup he absolutely wanted. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com