From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S288843AbSAEPhc>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:37:32 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S288846AbSAEPhV>; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:37:21 -0500
Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:2310 "HELO heather.ithnet.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S288843AbSAEPhG>;
	Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:37:06 -0500
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 16:37:03 +0100
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Klaus Zerwes <kzerwes@web.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug ?
Message-Id: <20020105163703.730e8b53.skraw@ithnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C36E715.9030303@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <3C30A9F0.3070603@web.de>
	<20011231195115.410b871f.skraw@ithnet.com>
	<3C36E715.9030303@web.de>
Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 05 Jan 2002 12:44:21 +0100
Klaus Zerwes <kzerwes@web.de> wrote:

> Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > Tell us if it happens again with 2.4.17, or if you are sure it does not,
> > declare it as solved.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Stephan
> > 
> 
> 
> I have copmpiles 2.4.16 and did some tests with a mirrored system ( 
> only the system, without the harddisks with data) using different 
> NICs: Davicom FE (dmfe), RT 8139C (8139too) and SMC 9432 EtherPower II 
>   83c172 (epic100).

Sorry, but why with 2.4.16? Is this a typo?

Regards,
Stephan