From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S291257AbSBGUD6>; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:03:58 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S291254AbSBGUDu>; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:03:50 -0500
Received: from tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil ([204.222.179.33]:36251 "EHLO
	tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S291251AbSBGUCl>; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:02:41 -0500
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:01:57 -0600 (CST)
From: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
Message-Id: <200202072001.OAA24983@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
To: davem@redhat.com, bruce@ask.ne.jp
Subject: Re: ?????????????????????
In-Reply-To: <20020207.034425.98342188.davem@redhat.com>
Cc: hiryuu@envisiongames.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailer: [XMailTool v3.1.2b]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

---------  Received message begins Here  ---------

> 
>    From: Bruce Harada <bruce@ask.ne.jp>
>    Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:12:43 +0900
> 
>    On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:42:17 -0500
>    Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote:
>    
>    > To my knowledge, there is no English word that would match that regex (or, 
>    > for that matter, any Romantic or Germanic language word).  It's the most 
>    > effective tool I've seen against Asian spam (like the one I replied to).
>    
>    Just to set the record straight, that was RUSSIAN spam, not Asian spam...
>    (The regex should still be effective, of course.)
> 
> Except that it would block out uuencoded patches in postings perhaps?
> Or is it just supposed to be matched in the Subject field or other
> parts of the headers?

I thought uuencode format required 7bit print ascii output, which would
never match that pattern.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.