From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S317151AbSEXTGG>; Fri, 24 May 2002 15:06:06 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S317190AbSEXTGE>; Fri, 24 May 2002 15:06:04 -0400
Received: from ns.snowman.net ([63.80.4.34]:528 "EHLO ns.snowman.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S317151AbSEXTFz>;
	Fri, 24 May 2002 15:05:55 -0400
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 15:01:50 -0400
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Austin Gonyou <austin@digitalroadkill.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 Kernel Perf discussion [Was Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again]
Message-ID: <20020524190150.GA9802@ns>
Mail-Followup-To: Austin Gonyou <austin@digitalroadkill.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <E17BHiQ-0006mJ-00@the-village.bc.nu> <423360000.1022257916@flay> <1022261405.9617.39.camel@UberGeek> <433620000.1022262234@flay> <1022263434.9591.60.camel@UberGeek> <435570000.1022263849@flay> <1022264970.10464.12.camel@UberGeek>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SmTdBPAXX0a3WoW0"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
X-Info: http://www.snowman.net
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.2.16 (i686)
X-Uptime: 14:53:00 up 198 days, 15:53, 13 users,  load average: 1.06, 1.10, 1.06
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--SmTdBPAXX0a3WoW0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

* Austin Gonyou (austin@digitalroadkill.net) wrote:
> As soon as I can get time on their systems to do 4/8-way testing, I'll
> make my benches available. Should be good stuff. :)

  I may be getting an opportunity in the next weeks/months to play with
  a 16-way SparcCenter 2000 w/ 85mhz procs and 3GB of ram.  I realize
  this machine is rather pokey but I was wondering if it might be useful
  to help test the kernel with a large number of processors.  So, if you
  or anyone else have some test you'd like me to run (assuming I get the
  machine all set up and running Linux) let me know and I'd be happy to
  try some things.

  	Stephen

--SmTdBPAXX0a3WoW0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE87o4drzgMPqB3kigRAkQtAJwO00CI2FQSoX4MOtDhKo4UYAF/1QCfXs7b
cRQEsyOTml0KRRdeDZB0lI4=
=iGey
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SmTdBPAXX0a3WoW0--