From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 07:12:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 07:12:35 -0400 Received: from [62.70.58.70] ([62.70.58.70]:49282 "EHLO mail.pronto.tv") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 27 May 2002 07:12:34 -0400 Message-Id: <200205271112.g4RBCH103186@mail.pronto.tv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Organization: Pronto TV AS To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 13:12:16 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com (Martin J. Bligh), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > How much RAM do you have, and what does /proc/meminfo > > > and /proc/slabinfo say just before the explosion point? > > > > I have 1 gig - highmem (not enabled) - 900 megs. > > for what I can see, kernel can't reclaim buffers fast enough. > > ut looks better on -aa. > > What sort of setup. I can't duplicate the problem here ? The setup is 2-4 drives in raid0, with chunk size 1MB. If I try to do ~50 simultanous reads from disk, it's no problem as long as the data is being read from the nic with the same speed as it's being read from disk. The server apps are running via inetd (testing), and have 2MB of buffer each. (read 2MB from disk, write 2MB to NIC). The server chrashes within minutes. The same problem occurs when using Tux thanks roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.