reiserfsprogs release

reiserfsprogs release

[Vitaly Fertman]

Hi,

that reiserfsprogs-3.x.1c-pre6 which you can find on our ftp 
site seems to be stable and they are going to become a new 
release within next few days. We encourge you to test it and 
to report about any possible problem.

-- 

Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Dirk Mueller]

On Die, 25 Jun 2002, Vitaly Fertman wrote:

> that reiserfsprogs-3.x.1c-pre6 which you can find on our ftp 
> site seems to be stable and they are going to become a new 
> release within next few days. We encourge you to test it and 
> to report about any possible problem.

changelog ?


Dirk

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Vitaly Fertman]

On Tuesday 25 June 2002 20:52, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Die, 25 Jun 2002, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > that reiserfsprogs-3.x.1c-pre6 which you can find on our ftp
> > site seems to be stable and they are going to become a new
> > release within next few days. We encourge you to test it and
> > to report about any possible problem.
>
> changelog ?

The most of changes are just bug fixes and speedups.
    StatData got wrong values sometimes.
    Tails were not converted back if had been converted to internal.
    Lost+found was not accessible sometimes due to wrong flag in 
    metadata.
    Extra checks on --check and fixes on --fix-fixable were added 
    for wrong st_nlinks, some info in internal tree.
    Some multiple checks during overwriting and relocation were 
    eliminated.
    Etc.

Added different block size support - 1k, 2k and for Alpha 8k. 
We are going to include the kernel patch after 2.4.19.

Support for bad block lists was added also but disabled for now 
due to some conflicts with the current kernel, which have not been 
solved yet.

-- 

Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

reiserfsprogs release

[Vitaly Fertman]

Hi all,

the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.

The most of changes are just bug fixes and speedups.
    StatData got wrong values sometimes.
    Tails were not converted back if had been converted to internal.
    Lost+found was not accessible sometimes due to wrong flag in
    metadata.
    Extra checks on --check and fixes on --fix-fixable were added
    for wrong st_nlinks, some info in internal tree.
    Some multiple checks during overwriting and relocation were
    eliminated.
    Etc.

Added different block size support - 1k, 2k and for Alpha 8k.
Kernel support we are going to include into 2.4.20.

Support for bad block lists was added also but disabled for now
due to some conflicts with the current kernel, which have not been
solved yet.

Verson numbering scheme was changed.

Another pre release 3.6.3-pre1 is also available. It includes some 
great speedups for reiserfsck.

-- 

Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Vitaly Fertman]

> I may be stupid, but if the latest release is 3.6.2 why is the "LATEST IS"
> link still pointing to 3.x.1b?  Is 3.6.2 the version which we (Gentoo
> Linux) should be packaging?  Is it more or less safe than 3.x.1b?  Thanks!

Yes, it is going to be changed.

-- 

Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Brandon Low]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1602 bytes --]

I may be stupid, but if the latest release is 3.6.2 why is the "LATEST IS" 
link still pointing to 3.x.1b?  Is 3.6.2 the version which we (Gentoo 
Linux) should be packaging?  Is it more or less safe than 3.x.1b?  Thanks!

--Brandon

On Wed, 07/10/02 at 12:06:48 +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> 
> The most of changes are just bug fixes and speedups.
>     StatData got wrong values sometimes.
>     Tails were not converted back if had been converted to internal.
>     Lost+found was not accessible sometimes due to wrong flag in
>     metadata.
>     Extra checks on --check and fixes on --fix-fixable were added
>     for wrong st_nlinks, some info in internal tree.
>     Some multiple checks during overwriting and relocation were
>     eliminated.
>     Etc.
> 
> Added different block size support - 1k, 2k and for Alpha 8k.
> Kernel support we are going to include into 2.4.20.
> 
> Support for bad block lists was added also but disabled for now
> due to some conflicts with the current kernel, which have not been
> solved yet.
> 
> Verson numbering scheme was changed.
> 
> Another pre release 3.6.3-pre1 is also available. It includes some 
> great speedups for reiserfsck.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Thanks,
> Vitaly Fertman
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Steven Cole]

On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 02:06, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> 

Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate?

Steven

--- linux-2.4.19-rc1/Documentation/Changes.orig	Wed Jul 10 08:12:24 2002
+++ linux-2.4.19-rc1/Documentation/Changes	Wed Jul 10 08:13:05 2002
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 o  modutils               2.4.2                   # insmod -V
 o  e2fsprogs              1.25                    # tune2fs
 o  jfsutils               1.0.12                  # fsck.jfs -V
-o  reiserfsprogs          3.x.1b                  # reiserfsck 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs
+o  reiserfsprogs          3.6.2                   # reiserfsck 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs
 o  pcmcia-cs              3.1.21                  # cardmgr -V
 o  PPP                    2.4.0                   # pppd --version
 o  isdn4k-utils           3.1pre1                 # isdnctrl 2>&1|grep version
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@
 
 Reiserfsprogs
 -------------
-o  <ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs-3.x.1b.tar.gz>
+o  <ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.2.tar.gz>
 
 LVM toolset
 -----------

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:23:54AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:

> > the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate?
> -o  reiserfsprogs          3.x.1b                  # reiserfsck 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs
> +o  reiserfsprogs          3.6.2                   # reiserfsck 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs

Not yet. We do not want to disturb Marchello with more patches now.
We will submit similar patch after 2.4.19 is out.

Bye,
    Oleg

Re: Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:23:54AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:

> > the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate?
> -o  reiserfsprogs          3.x.1b                  # reiserfsck 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs
> +o  reiserfsprogs          3.6.2                   # reiserfsck 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs

Not yet. We do not want to disturb Marchello with more patches now.
We will submit similar patch after 2.4.19 is out.

Bye,
    Oleg

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:23:54AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 02:06, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> > 
> 
> Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate?

Does reiserfs in 2.4.19-pre require that version?  if yes it would be
very bad (2.4 is not supposed to need newer userlevel during the series)

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Chris Mason]

On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 10:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:23:54AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 02:06, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> > > 
> > 
> > Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate?
> 
> Does reiserfs in 2.4.19-pre require that version?  if yes it would be
> very bad (2.4 is not supposed to need newer userlevel during the series)

No, it does not require that version.  It is a good idea since fsck
improves with each release though ;-)

-chris

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Christoph Hellwig]

> No, it does not require that version.  It is a good idea since fsck
> improves with each release though ;-)

the list in Documentation/Changes is what's needed _at least_.  It doesn't
make much sense to upgrade it all the time.

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:38:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> > > the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> > Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate?

> Does reiserfs in 2.4.19-pre require that version?  if yes it would be

No.

> very bad (2.4 is not supposed to need newer userlevel during the series)

Well, sometimes you want to upgrade not because it is required, but because
of bugfixed you will get out of newer version.

Bye,
    Oleg

Re: Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:38:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> > > the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> > Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate?

> Does reiserfs in 2.4.19-pre require that version?  if yes it would be

No.

> very bad (2.4 is not supposed to need newer userlevel during the series)

Well, sometimes you want to upgrade not because it is required, but because
of bugfixed you will get out of newer version.

Bye,
    Oleg

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Matthias Andree]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:23:54AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:
> > On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 02:06, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp site.
> > > 
> > 
> > Is the following patch to Documentation/Changes appropriate?
> 
> Does reiserfs in 2.4.19-pre require that version?  if yes it would be
> very bad (2.4 is not supposed to need newer userlevel during the series)

Well, there's user-space and user-space. A part of the user space is
kernel/system oriented, like fsck.* or util-linux (mount, chattr!)
configuration tools or user-space parts of drivers, and there's a part
of user-space that is unrelated.

If the kernel related stuff (which usually is in /sbin) needs to be
updated, that's fine even for a "stable" kernel. If the new
reiserfs-progs fix a problem of an older version, then by all means go
fix and update Documentation/Changes. There could be a new "recommended"
column though which lists non-critical version updates.

-- 
Matthias Andree

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Hubert Chan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 733 bytes --]

>>>>> "Vitaly" =3D=3D Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com> writes:

Vitaly> Hi all, the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp
Vitaly> site. ...

The web site (http://namesys.com/download.html) still claims that 3.x.1b
is the latest.

BTW, the second box from the top on the left (re: don't compile with GCC
2.96) has yellow text on a white background for me - Mozilla 1.0.  Aha!
The bgcolor for that table cell is missing the # in front of the colour
code, so Mozilla doesn't understand the colour.

=2D-=20
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Hubert Chan]

My last message somehow got borked along the way, so I'm resending it,
without GPG signature.

>>>>> "Vitaly" = Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com> writes:

Vitaly> Hi all, the latest reiserfsprogs-3.6.2 is available on our ftp
Vitaly> site. ...

The web site (http://namesys.com/download.html) still claims that 3.x.1b
is the latest.

BTW, the second box from the top on the left (re: don't compile with GCC
2.96) has yellow text on a white background for me - Mozilla 1.0.  Aha!
The bgcolor for that table cell is missing the # in front of the colour
code, so Mozilla doesn't understand the colour.

-- 
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.

Re: Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 02:32:48PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:

> The web site (http://namesys.com/download.html) still claims that 3.x.1b
> is the latest.
> BTW, the second box from the top on the left (re: don't compile with GCC
> 2.96) has yellow text on a white background for me - Mozilla 1.0.  Aha!
> The bgcolor for that table cell is missing the # in front of the colour
> code, so Mozilla doesn't understand the colour.

Thanks a lot for this info, fixed now.

Bye,
    Oleg

reiserfsprogs release

[Vitaly Fertman]

Hi all,

a critical bug was fixed in reiserfsck journal replay process, 
so we decided to release a new 3.6.3 progs with just 2 bug 
fixes related to it.

-- 

Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Vitaly Fertman]

> On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 11:42, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > a critical bug was fixed in reiserfsck journal replay process,
> > so we decided to release a new 3.6.3 progs with just 2 bug
> > fixes related to it.
>
> What version does reiserfsck in this report. That way I can update

All utilities have the same version as the package has, so 3.6.3.

> CHANGES to indicate the 3.6.3 bits are required.
>
> Right now it says 3.x.1b - should it now say 3.6.3 ?

This bug was introduced in 3.6.2, so 3.x.1b was not affected.
But 3.x.1b contains many other bugs which were fixed in 3.6.2.

-- 

Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Alan Cox]

On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 11:42, Vitaly Fertman wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> a critical bug was fixed in reiserfsck journal replay process, 
> so we decided to release a new 3.6.3 progs with just 2 bug 
> fixes related to it.

What version does reiserfsck in this report. That way I can update
CHANGES to indicate the 3.6.3 bits are required.

Right now it says 3.x.1b - should it now say 3.6.3 ?

Re: reiserfsprogs release

[Dieter Nützel]

On Die, 25 Jun 2002, Vitaly Fertman wrote:

> that reiserfsprogs-3.x.1c-pre6 which you can find on our ftp 
> site seems to be stable and they are going to become a new 
> release within next few days. We encourge you to test it and 
> to report about any possible problem.

Can you than pump the version number to the OSS/Linux standard like Hans 
agreed lately before you release it, please?

Thanks,
	Dieter

-- 
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de