From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:46:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:46:42 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:5569 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:46:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:45:51 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Andre Hedrick Cc: "Holzrichter, Bruce" , Richard Zidlicky , "'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: (RE: using 2.5.25 with IDE) On sparc64..... Message-ID: <20020711054551.GD1059@suse.de> References: <61DB42B180EAB34E9D28346C11535A783A7B86@nocmail101.ma.tmpw.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 10 2002, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > The locking code is broken because the port forward fail to carry all > issues. Where is it broken? The 2.4 forward port has the exact same locking as the 2.4 base. And I do mean identical. -- Jens Axboe