From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: "Joseph Malicki" <jmalicki@starbak.net>
Cc: "Patrick J. LoPresti" <patl@curl.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: close return value
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 16:42:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020720144217.GA2259@win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <015401c22f40$c4471380$da5b903f@starbak.net>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 12:24:33PM -0400, Joseph Malicki wrote:
> Those mistakes are your ignorance. The manpage is wrong.
> It does return -1 on error.
Yes, you are right (or, at least, "a negative value").
Now you deserve a beating for noting that there is a bug on
a man page without submitting a correction, or at least
telling the maintainer. (Yes, that's me.)
> Sure, if you require an event to be successful to continue you should always
> check it. And yes, it's nice to print an error message on close sometimes,
> if something is critical. But the question to ask is what you would
> actually _DO_ about an error... if the answer is nothing,
> then why check it?
But here you are wrong. Even if the program doesn't know what to do,
the user will want to know about it. If I make a backup and some error
occurs then I would be very unhappy if the program were silent about it.
Andries
aeb@cwi.nl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-20 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20020712162306$aa7d@traf.lcs.mit.edu>
[not found] ` <mit.lcs.mail.linux-kernel/20020712162306$aa7d@traf.lcs.mit.edu>
2002-07-15 15:22 ` [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-15 17:31 ` Chris Mason
2002-07-15 18:33 ` Matthias Andree
[not found] ` <20020715173337$acad@traf.lcs.mit.edu>
[not found] ` <mit.lcs.mail.linux-kernel/20020715173337$acad@traf.lcs.mit.edu>
2002-07-15 19:13 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-15 20:55 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-15 21:23 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-15 21:38 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-16 12:31 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-16 15:53 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-16 19:26 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-16 19:38 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-16 23:22 ` close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks) Zack Weinberg
2002-07-17 1:03 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-16 23:52 ` close return value David S. Miller
2002-07-17 1:35 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-17 0:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-07-17 1:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-17 1:05 ` David S. Miller
2002-07-17 1:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-17 11:51 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-17 17:23 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-07-20 8:00 ` Florian Weimer
2002-07-20 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-26 0:06 ` EFAULT vs. SIGSEGV [was Re: close return value] Pavel Machek
2002-07-26 14:01 ` (no subject) Alexis Deruelle
[not found] ` <mailman.1026868201.10433.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-07-18 0:01 ` close return value Pete Zaitcev
2002-07-18 0:10 ` Thunder from the hill
[not found] ` <mit.lcs.mail.linux-kernel/200207180001.g6I015f02681@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
2002-07-18 14:42 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-18 15:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-07-18 15:32 ` Sandy Harris
2002-07-18 23:47 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-07-19 16:12 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-19 16:24 ` Joseph Malicki
2002-07-19 18:48 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-19 19:25 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-07-19 19:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-19 19:45 ` Joseph Malicki
2002-07-19 19:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-20 18:25 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2002-07-20 23:06 ` Sandy Harris
2002-07-20 14:42 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2002-07-18 20:09 ` Hildo.Biersma
2002-07-18 23:55 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-07-19 11:31 ` Hildo.Biersma
2002-07-19 16:16 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-07-23 22:19 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-07-17 0:10 ` close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks) Zack Weinberg
2002-07-17 1:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-17 18:24 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-07-22 16:42 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-07-17 8:00 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-07-17 15:49 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-17 2:22 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 2:54 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-17 3:00 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 3:10 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-17 3:31 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 4:17 ` Stevie O
2002-07-17 4:38 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 14:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-07-17 16:49 ` Elladan
2002-07-17 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-07-17 22:07 ` Elladan
2002-07-18 9:48 ` Ketil Froyn
2002-07-17 17:17 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-07-17 17:51 ` Richard Gooch
2002-07-17 7:34 ` close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks Kai Henningsen
2002-07-15 21:59 ` Ketil Froyn
2002-07-15 23:08 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-07-16 12:33 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-15 22:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-07-15 21:58 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-15 21:14 ` Chris Mason
2002-07-15 21:31 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-15 22:12 ` Richard A Nelson
2002-07-16 1:02 ` Lawrence Greenfield
[not found] ` <mit.lcs.mail.linux-kernel/200207160102.g6G12BiH022986@lin2.andrew.cmu.edu>
2002-07-16 1:43 ` Patrick J. LoPresti
2002-07-16 1:56 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-16 12:47 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-16 21:09 ` James Antill
2002-07-16 12:35 ` Matthias Andree
2002-07-16 7:07 ` Dax Kelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020720144217.GA2259@win.tue.nl \
--to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=jmalicki@starbak.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patl@curl.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.