From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:04:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:04:22 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:63884 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:04:21 -0500 Message-Id: <200301092112.h09LCxpQ010633@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4+dev To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: "Mother" == "computer-illiterate" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:46:30 PST." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1280067701P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 16:12:59 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1280067701P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:46:30 PST, "Randy.Dunlap" said: > (ugh, COBOL) Go back and research the alternatives available at the time. Then ask yourself which you'd prefer to do maintenance programming on. --==_Exmh_1280067701P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE+HeXbcC3lWbTT17ARAoKAAJ97mzKeUr7FIYkh5H+0oN29lfwOFwCgkTgA BMFqHJxkWmaAq/Vh0vzT0+4= =J4av -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1280067701P--