All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@cc.hut.fi>
Subject: Re: Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:42:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030226194209.GA20861@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1030226143644.5091B-100000@chaos>

On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:40:27PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:23:19PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 11:33:09PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > > > > Jean Tourrilhes writes:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > It looks like a compiler bug to me...
> > > > > > Some users have complained that when the following
> > > > > > code is compiled without the -fno-strict-aliasing,
> > > > > > the order of the write and memcpy is inverted (which
> > > > > > mean a bogus len is mem-copied into the stream).
> > > > > > Code (from linux/include/net/iw_handler.h) :
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------
> > > > > > static inline char *
> > > > > > iwe_stream_add_event(char * stream,  /* Stream of events */
> > > > > >        char * ends,  /* End of stream */
> > > > > >        struct iw_event *iwe, /* Payload */
> > > > > >        int event_len) /* Real size of payload */
> > > > > > {
> > > > > >  /* Check if it's possible */
> > > > > >  if((stream + event_len) < ends) {
> > > > > >   iwe->len = event_len;
> > > > > >   memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);
> > > > > >   stream += event_len;
> > > > > >  } return stream;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------
> > > > > > IMHO, the compiler should have enough context to
> > > > > > know that the reordering is dangerous. Any suggestion
> > > > > > to make this simple code more bullet proof is welcomed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have fun...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since (char*) is special, I agree that it's a bug.
> > > > > In any case, a warning sure would be nice!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Now for the fun. Pass iwe->len into this
> > > > > macro before the memcpy, and all should be well.
> > > > > 
> > > > > #define FORCE_TO_MEM(x) asm volatile(""::"r"(&(x)))
> > > > > 
> > > > > Like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > >    iwe->len = event_len;
> > > > >    FORCE_TO_MEM(iwe->len);
> > > > >    memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len);
> > > > 
> > > > 	I'll try that, that sounds absolutely clever (but I only
> > > > understand half of it).
> > > > 	Thanks a lot !
> > > > 
> > > > 	Jean
> > > > -
> > > 
> > > This does absoultely nothing with egcs-2.91.66. I also modified
> > > 
> > >  #define FORCE_TO_MEM(x) asm volatile(""::"r"(&(x)))
> > >                                            |________ this to "memory"
> > > 
> > > and it still does nothing. The result of gcc -O2 -S -o xxx xxx.c just
> > > shows:
> > > 
> > > #AP
> > > #NOAP
> > > 
> > > With no code in-between.
> > > 
> > > I also changed it to:
> > >  #define FORCE_TO_MEM(x) __asm__ __volatile__(""::"r"(&(x)))
> > > to no avail.
> > > 
> > > What's up?
> > 
> > That's "working".  Does it prevent the reordering?
> 
> It was supposed to force x, which may be cached in a register,
> to be written to memory __now__. It doesn't seem to do anything.
> I think FORCE_TO_MEM() needs to claim that it uses most all the
> registers. That will make sure that any register values get
> written to their final memory locations.

If so it wouldn't be inside the #APP/#NOAPP markers.  You didn't answer
my other question: was X in memory at the time?

You should be using something like __asm__ __volatile__ (""::"m"(x))
anyway.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-26 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-26  4:33 Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing Albert Cahalan
2003-02-26 17:20 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 18:23   ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:22     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 19:40       ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 19:42         ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-02-26 20:19           ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-26 21:30             ` Albert Cahalan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-11-03  1:54 Yubin Ruan
2017-11-03 12:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-03 13:33   ` Yubin Ruan
2017-11-03 14:03     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-03 14:12       ` Yubin Ruan
2017-11-03 14:38         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-03 23:26           ` Yubin Ruan
2017-11-03 23:55             ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-04  0:24               ` Yubin Ruan
2003-02-25 23:46 Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 15:38 ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 16:04   ` Falk Hueffner
2003-02-26 20:47     ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-26 20:57       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-26 22:22         ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-02-27 19:30           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 19:45             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:00               ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 20:35                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-27 20:38                   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-27 23:55                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-01  8:29                     ` Anton Blanchard
2003-02-26 17:22   ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-26 21:07     ` Horst von Brand
2003-02-27  4:41       ` Daniel Phillips
2003-02-26 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030226194209.GA20861@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=dan@debian.org \
    --cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jkmaline@cc.hut.fi \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.