From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: Horrible ftruncate performance Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:49:44 +0400 Message-ID: <20030711144943.GE17180@namesys.com> References: <20030710052931.GA17957@namesys.com> <20030710092112.GA837@namesys.com> <200307111635.27904.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307111635.27904.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dieter N?tzel Cc: Szakacsits Szabolcs , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Chris Mason Hello! On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 04:35:27PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote: > daul Athlon MP 1900+ > U160 > Argh! ---I can't kill it! > No CNTL-C or '"killall -9 dd" or under "top". > Even as root;-( Yup. It spins in kernel mode not listening to signals busy doing balancing for lots of zeroes, one at a time. > 2.4.21-jam1 (aa1) plus all data-logging > SOURCE/dri-trunk> time dd if=/dev/zero of=sparse bs=1 seek=200G count=1 > 0.000u 362.760s 8:26.34 71.6% 0+0k 0+0io 124pf+0w > It was runinng with a paralell C++ (-j20) compilation. > Is the mentioned patch needed? Yes, patch is needed for any system that does not contain it. Bye, Oleg