From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69852482A for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:35:16 -0600 (MDT) Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.14) id 19azvX-0007BQ-Mw; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:35:15 +0100 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 16:35:15 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Alan Cox , HPPA List Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [2.5] ns87415 irq Message-ID: <20030711153515.GE20424@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20030711151640.GD20424@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:32:12PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > BTW, Bart, seems like sparc64 does _have_ the ide_default_irq() function, > > it just returns 0. So I think this patch shouldn't break anything. > > Yes, but 0 != 14 && 0 != 15. I am just paranoid. :-) Oh, 14 and 15 are not valid sparc64 irqs. No problem. -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk