From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: Horrible ftruncate performance Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:44:15 +0400 Message-ID: <20030711154415.GI17180@namesys.com> References: <20030710052931.GA17957@namesys.com> <200307111716.56823.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20030711152431.GF17180@namesys.com> <200307111730.50601.m.c.p@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307111730.50601.m.c.p@gmx.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Marc-Christian Petersen Cc: Dieter N?tzel , Szakacsits Szabolcs , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Chris Mason Hello! On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > > Actually I did it already, as data-logging patches can be applied to > > 2.4.22-pre3 (where this truncate patch was included). > > > Maybe it _IS_ time for this _AND_ all the other data-logging patches? > > > 2.4.22-pre5? > > It's Chris turn. I thought it is good idea to test in -ac first, though > > (even taking into account that these patches are part of SuSE's stock > > kernels). > Well, I don't think that testing in -ac is necessary at all in this case. May be not. But it is still useful ;) > I am using WOLK on many production machines with ReiserFS mostly as Fileserver > (hundred of gigabytes) and proxy caches. I am using this code on my production server myself ;) > If someone would ask me: Go for 2.4 mainline inclusion w/o going via -ac! :) Chris should decide (and Marcelo should agree) (Actually Chris thought it is good idea to submit data-logging to Marcelo now, too). I have no objections. Also now, that quota v2 code is in place, even quota code can be included. Also it would be great to port this stuff to 2.5 (yes, I know Chris wants this to be in 2.4 first) Bye, Oleg