From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew de Quincey Subject: Re: ACPI PCI routing problem Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:29:27 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <200307111729.27552.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> References: <200307110022.29512.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> <200307111243.34695.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net> <1057932596.20629.0.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1057932596.20629.0.camel-2MMpYkNvuYAXoXS6vNje7nviChZXdy279dF7HbQ/qKg@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Alan Cox Cc: Ducrot Bruno , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Friday 11 July 2003 15:09, Alan Cox wrote: > On Gwe, 2003-07-11 at 12:43, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > > How look /proc/interrupts with IO-APIC, but without ACPI (I mean, no > > > acpi at all at compile time)? > > > > Hi, here you go. ACPI disabled, but APIC/IO-APIC left in. Interesting, > > everything is set to XT-PIC.... > > > > During boot it says: Found and enabled local APIC! > > But does not have any mention of the IO-APIC. > > local apic and i/o apic are seperate devices. A system can have one > (on the CPU) but not the other Yep. My system does have an IO APIC however. It doesn't find it when I disable ACPI. I assume this is the expected behaviour, since otherwise you'd have to scan in the area of memory they're mapped to. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1