From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: Horrible ftruncate performance Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 17:00:12 +0400 Message-ID: <20030713130012.GC6061@namesys.com> References: <200307121605.27404.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307121605.27404.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dieter N?tzel Cc: Szakacsits Szabolcs , Chris Mason , Marc-Christian Petersen , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Philippe Gramoull? Hello! On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 04:05:27PM +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote: > > Footnotes: > > (*) So disk shouldn't matter because the other filesystems use only 4kB to > > store this 200GB sparse file. ReiserFS wastes 201MB! > No. Exactly 8192 bytes (8 KibiBytes) No, he is right. Space usage is ~ holesize>>10 (for 4k blocksize) Empty tree pointers take this space. Bye, Oleg