All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
To: krkumar@us.ibm.com
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, davem@redhat.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	linux-net@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:47:01 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030718.004701.11546819.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F17245D.9040806@us.ibm.com>

In article <3F17245D.9040806@us.ibm.com> (at Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:34:05 -0700), Krishna Kumar <krkumar@us.ibm.com> says:

> have any knowledge of using this new interface. If you prefer, I can split the
> patch for prefix list vs O/M bits so that the former is accepted without any
> issues. Someone else can modify the O/M to suit new needs. Does that sound OK
> with you ?

Yes, please split up the patch.


>  > At least, new RTM_xxx should not be restricted to get such flags.
> 
> That's why I had suggested that we can use RTM_GETLNKINFO with more information,
> like RTA_IFFLAGS, and other things like stats or whatever. That can be done
> easily enough and still be functionally complete. I just don't have any idea
> about this new interface.
> 
> Is this still a problem ?

Hmm, I might miss something.
Anyway, it seems we're reaching consensus.

--yoshfuji

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-17 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-14 22:35 [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73 Krishna Kumar
2003-07-15  1:17 ` kuznet
2003-07-15  6:59   ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-15 13:20     ` kuznet
2003-07-15 18:34   ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-16  0:11     ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-16  0:21     ` kuznet
2003-07-16  8:39       ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-16 18:42         ` [PATCH 1/2] " Krishna Kumar
2003-07-16 18:49           ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-16 18:50           ` [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List against 2.4.21 Krishna Kumar
2003-07-16 23:41         ` [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73 kuznet
2003-07-17  0:06           ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-17  0:38             ` kuznet
2003-07-17 21:12               ` [PATCH 1/2] Prefix List and O/M flags " Krishna Kumar
2003-07-17 22:06                 ` [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21 Krishna Kumar
2003-07-17 22:22                   ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-17 22:34                     ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-17 22:47                       ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 [this message]
2003-07-18  0:37                         ` [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.5.73 Krishna Kumar
2003-07-19  6:47                           ` David S. Miller
2003-07-19  7:33                           ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-21  0:49                             ` kuznet
2003-07-21 12:17                           ` David S. Miller
2003-07-21 17:16                             ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-21  1:55                       ` [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21 kuznet
2003-07-21  4:46                         ` David S. Miller
2003-07-22 21:50                         ` O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1 Krishna Kumar
2003-07-22 22:25                           ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-22 22:59                             ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-23 10:13                           ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 22:32                             ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-24  7:07                               ` David S. Miller
2003-07-24 14:02                                 ` kuznet
2003-07-24 14:26                                   ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-24 14:43                                     ` kuznet
2003-07-25  0:14                                       ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-25 13:22                                         ` David S. Miller
2003-07-30  0:33                                 ` Krishna Kumar
2003-07-31  5:02                                   ` David S. Miller
2003-07-31 20:33                                     ` Krishna Kumar
2003-08-04 23:57                                       ` David S. Miller
2003-09-05 18:26                                         ` Krishna Kumar
2003-09-12  2:25                                           ` David S. Miller
2003-09-12 22:36                                             ` Krishna Kumar
2003-09-12 22:45                                             ` O/M flags for 2.4.22 (was "Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1") Krishna Kumar
2003-09-13  0:19                                               ` David S. Miller
2003-09-16 22:06                                                 ` Krishna Kumar
2003-09-20  8:18                                                   ` David S. Miller
2003-07-22 23:52                         ` [PATCH] Prefix List against 2.4.21 Krishna Kumar
2003-07-23 10:02                           ` David S. Miller
2003-07-17 21:53               ` [PATCH 1/4] Prefix List against 2.5.73 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030718.004701.11546819.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --to=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=krkumar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.