From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272031AbTGRVYC (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:24:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272017AbTGRVUg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:20:36 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:3226 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271844AbTGRVUW (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:20:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 14:27:20 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ricardo Galli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0-test1 Ext3 Ooops. Reboot needed. Message-Id: <20030718142720.40983f6a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200307182313.23288.gallir@uib.es> References: <200307181228.40142.gallir@uib.es> <20030718140019.4f6667bd.akpm@osdl.org> <200307182313.23288.gallir@uib.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0pre1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ricardo Galli wrote: > > "File alteration monitor", from Debian. OK. > $ apt-cache show fam I was attacked by dselect as a small child and have since avoided debian. Is there a tarball anywhere? > Nevertheless I saw the same message the morning after updatedb run. But was the "Process:" also famd in that case? A bug in the dnotify code is unsurprising - it doesn't get used or tested much, and many things around it have changed.