From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267091AbTGTNIo (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:08:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267096AbTGTNIo (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:08:44 -0400 Received: from treason.nexuslabs.com ([207.113.83.225]:58119 "EHLO treason.nexuslabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267091AbTGTNIn (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:08:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 09:23:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Charles E. Youse" To: "Theodore Ts'o" cc: John Bradford , , , , , , Subject: Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD In-Reply-To: <20030720000716.GA1085@think> Message-ID: <20030720092239.E75410-100000@treason.nexuslabs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > As far as I know, HURD is using ext2fs code. It should definitely be > called HURD/Linux. :-) My understanding is that theirs is a re-implementation of ext2, not a port. C.