All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glenn Fowler <gsf@research.att.com>
To: davem@redhat.com, gsf@research.att.com
Cc: dgk@research.att.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: kernel bug in socketpair()
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:54:49 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307231854.OAA90112@raptor.research.att.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030723112307.5b8ae55c.davem@redhat.com


On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:07 -0700 David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:14:57 -0400 (EDT)
> Glenn Fowler <gsf@research.att.com> wrote:

> > named sockets seem a little heavyweight for this application

> I think it'll be cheaper than unnamed unix sockets and
> groveling in /proc/*/fd/

> And even if there is a minor performance issue, you'll more than get
> that back due to the portability gain. :-)

named unix sockets reside in the fs namespace, no?
so they must be linked to a dir before use and unlinked after use
the unlink after use would be particularly tricky for the parent process
implementing
	cmd <(cmd ...) ...


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-23 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-23 14:28 Re: kernel bug in socketpair() David Korn
2003-07-23 14:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 16:56   ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 17:00     ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 17:24       ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 17:31         ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 18:14           ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 18:23             ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 18:54               ` Glenn Fowler [this message]
2003-07-23 19:04                 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 19:11                   ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 19:14                     ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 19:29                       ` Glenn Fowler
2003-07-23 19:56                         ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 22:24                         ` jw schultz
2003-07-23 19:08                 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 19:41       ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-07-23 17:50     ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 23:27       ` Bill Rugolsky Jr.
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-23 13:32 David Korn
2003-07-23 14:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 14:20 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 15:36   ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 16:13     ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200307231854.OAA90112@raptor.research.att.com \
    --to=gsf@research.att.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgk@research.att.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.