From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271400AbTGXAj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:39:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271401AbTGXAj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:39:27 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:59147 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271400AbTGXAj0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:39:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:54:31 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: ahljoh@uni.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: directory inclusion in ext2/ext3 Message-ID: <20030724005431.GJ1176@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: ahljoh@uni.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030723202225.F257B371@mendocino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030723202225.F257B371@mendocino> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:22:24PM +0200, softpro@gmx.net wrote: > well, not really. unionfs is close because with a "mount -o bind" and > additive mounting my problem would be solved, but what i'm looking for is a > very high-level solution. as i said, my idea of solving this is to have an > inclusion directive in directory-files... > > has nobody ever felt the lack of such functionality?? I guess not. What exactly does this help you to do? What do you want to accomplish?