From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:13:55 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] RE: Nand OOB layout, u-boot and the kernel sources do not agree.. ?? 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:59:44 EDT."
             <00512BA4F9D3D311912A009027E9B8F407E524@NT> 
Message-ID: <20030724191400.66FC3C602D@atlas.denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

In message <00512BA4F9D3D311912A009027E9B8F407E524@NT> you wrote:
>
> Position 5 is where the chip makers mark bad sectors, so we do not
> get a choice. The NAND_NOOB values in U-BOOT are wrong and should
> be changed to match the new ones in the Linux kernel. I think the
> original cmd_nand.c was based on a very old version of MTD.

Probably. Can anybody please submit a patch, then?


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
This all sounds complicated, but it mostly does excatly what you  ex-
pect. It's just difficult for us to explain what you expect...
                       - L. Wall & R. L. Schwartz, _Programming Perl_